SafeManip is a benchmark applying reusable LTLf templates across eight safety categories to evaluate temporal properties in robotic manipulation on VLA policies.
Failure-Aware RL: Reliable Offline- to-Online Reinforcement Learning with Self-Recovery for Real-World Manipulation
7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
7
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
other 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 7representative citing papers
DreamAvoid uses a Dream Trigger, Action Proposer, and Dream Evaluator trained on success/failure/boundary data to let VLA policies avoid critical-phase failures via test-time future dreaming.
AEGIS uses activation probes for early-warning detection of high-risk steps in weak policies and selectively escalates to stronger policies, recovering 10.1% of lost trajectories on LIBERO-Spatial while activating the strong policy on only 38% of steps.
ZPRL adapts frozen flow-matching imitation policies via RL perturbations on a task-relevant bottleneck latent, yielding 33.7% higher average success on four real-world manipulation tasks than action-residual baselines.
A learning-augmented robotic system automated deformable cable insertion and soldering on a live electric-motor production line for 5 hours 10 minutes, producing 108 motors at 99.4% pass rate with under 20 minutes of real-world data per task and no physical fencing.
FAR combines failure-contrastive preference adaptation with action perturbations for test-time recovery and continual policy improvement, reporting 17.6% and 11.7% success gains over diffusion policies in simulation and real-world manipulation tasks.
Rule-based high-level guidance combined with goal-conditioned reinforcement learning enables safer and more efficient online adaptation for UAV search-and-rescue tasks under limited simulation training.
citing papers explorer
-
DreamAvoid: Critical-Phase Test-Time Dreaming to Avoid Failures in VLA Policies
DreamAvoid uses a Dream Trigger, Action Proposer, and Dream Evaluator trained on success/failure/boundary data to let VLA policies avoid critical-phase failures via test-time future dreaming.