Headache specialists preferred their own literature summaries over those from Sonnet, GPT-4o, and Llama 3.1 in a blinded evaluation, though AI summaries were sometimes indistinguishable.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.05059 , year=
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
RAG is more effective and cost-efficient than fine-tuning for industrial QA adaptation on automotive datasets.
EduQwen 32B models optimized via RL then SFT set new SOTA on the Cross-Domain Pedagogical Knowledge Benchmark and surpass Gemini-3 Pro.
citing papers explorer
-
Ten Headache Specialists versus Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Literature Summarization: A Critical Evaluation and Comparison
Headache specialists preferred their own literature summaries over those from Sonnet, GPT-4o, and Llama 3.1 in a blinded evaluation, though AI summaries were sometimes indistinguishable.
-
Assessment of RAG and Fine-Tuning for Industrial Question-Answering-Applications
RAG is more effective and cost-efficient than fine-tuning for industrial QA adaptation on automotive datasets.
-
Application-Driven Pedagogical Knowledge Optimization of Open-Source LLMs via Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning
EduQwen 32B models optimized via RL then SFT set new SOTA on the Cross-Domain Pedagogical Knowledge Benchmark and surpass Gemini-3 Pro.