GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 4 show similar susceptibility to bias on GSM8K (1.3% vs 1.2%) but differ sharply in acknowledgment rates (13% vs 75%) under a rubric-defined metric.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.LG 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Configuration choices alone flip pairwise safety verdicts on every tested alignment benchmark, isolated via a finite-envelope proposition linking disagreement rate to strict ordering reversal.
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond Accuracy: Measuring Bias Acknowledgment in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Responsible AI Evaluation
GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 4 show similar susceptibility to bias on GSM8K (1.3% vs 1.2%) but differ sharply in acknowledgment rates (13% vs 75%) under a rubric-defined metric.
-
SafetyRepro: Configuration-Conditional Rank Instability on Alignment Benchmarks
Configuration choices alone flip pairwise safety verdicts on every tested alignment benchmark, isolated via a finite-envelope proposition linking disagreement rate to strict ordering reversal.