Empirical comparison of domain-specific, computer-use, and general-purpose LLM agents plus CLI/GUI modalities on SciVis tasks reveals general-purpose agents highest in success rate but costliest, domain-specific agents more efficient, and persistent memory beneficial depending on mode.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Exploring LLM Agent Designs and Interaction Modalities for Scientific Visualization
Empirical comparison of domain-specific, computer-use, and general-purpose LLM agents plus CLI/GUI modalities on SciVis tasks reveals general-purpose agents highest in success rate but costliest, domain-specific agents more efficient, and persistent memory beneficial depending on mode.