Defeater Cards introduce a new 5W1H-structured documentation method for systematically characterizing defeaters in safety assurance cases, supported by an open repository and demonstrated in cross-domain case studies.
Assurance 2.0: A Manifesto
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Understanding should be made an explicit, assessable component of assurance cases for critical systems by drawing on epistemology and using structured argumentation to create artefacts like an Understanding Basis and Personal Understanding Statements.
A structured review of JSP 936 identifies eight challenge areas in operationalising AI assurance for UK Defence and concludes that further methods, guidance, and organisational capability are required.
citing papers explorer
-
Defeater Cards: Characterizing and Managing Safety Assurance Case Defeaters
Defeater Cards introduce a new 5W1H-structured documentation method for systematically characterizing defeaters in safety assurance cases, supported by an open repository and demonstrated in cross-domain case studies.
-
Understanding: reframing automation and assurance
Understanding should be made an explicit, assessable component of assurance cases for critical systems by drawing on epistemology and using structured argumentation to create artefacts like an Understanding Basis and Personal Understanding Statements.
-
AI Assurance in UK Defence: Challenges in Operationalising JSP 936
A structured review of JSP 936 identifies eight challenge areas in operationalising AI assurance for UK Defence and concludes that further methods, guidance, and organisational capability are required.