Interventions in LLM-simulated user experiments induce distribution shifts in latent attributes that create confounding bias, diagnosable with negative control outcomes and partially mitigated by adding setting-relevant persona details.
Personas with Attitudes: Controlling LLM s for Diverse Data Annotation
9 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
9
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 9representative citing papers
Reward models for LLMs frequently select socially undesirable options across four social domains, show no overall best performer, and exhibit a bias-avoidance versus context-sensitivity trade-off.
Cross-lingual transfer and language-specific data efforts are interdependent and complementary for effective low-resource NLP, as demonstrated through Luxembourgish case studies and synthesis.
LLM-generated ML pipelines show higher bias (87.7% sensitive attributes) than conditional statements (59.2%), indicating that simple if-statement tests underestimate bias risk in practical code generation.
A feature-based decision tree with parsing-derived signals and heuristics detects LLM-generated code in a lightweight, CPU-only setup for SemEval-2026 Task 13.
Finetuning Qwen3-32B with data augmentation and self-training achieves competitive 8th-place ranking on SemEval-2026 conspiracy detection.
Finetuning LLMs with QLoRA and multilingual data augmentation for polarization detection, type, and manifestation in SemEval-2026 Task 9.
Fine-tuning LLMs by adapting the mdok approach produces competitive results on binary detection, source attribution, and hybrid/adversarial code identification in SemEval-2026 Task 13.
citing papers explorer
-
The Illusion of Intervention: Your LLM-Simulated Experiment is an Observational Study
Interventions in LLM-simulated user experiments induce distribution shifts in latent attributes that create confounding bias, diagnosable with negative control outcomes and partially mitigated by adding setting-relevant persona details.
-
Misaligned by Reward: Socially Undesirable Preferences in LLMs
Reward models for LLMs frequently select socially undesirable options across four social domains, show no overall best performer, and exhibit a bias-avoidance versus context-sensitivity trade-off.
-
Why Low-Resource NLP Needs More Than Cross-Lingual Transfer: Lessons Learned from Luxembourgish
Cross-lingual transfer and language-specific data efforts are interdependent and complementary for effective low-resource NLP, as demonstrated through Luxembourgish case studies and synthesis.
-
From If-Statements to ML Pipelines: Revisiting Bias in Code-Generation
LLM-generated ML pipelines show higher bias (87.7% sensitive attributes) than conditional statements (59.2%), indicating that simple if-statement tests underestimate bias risk in practical code generation.
-
FMI_SU_Yotkova_Kastreva at SemEval-2026 Task 13: Lightweight Detection of LLM-Generated Code via Stylometric Signals
A feature-based decision tree with parsing-derived signals and heuristics detects LLM-generated code in a lightweight, CPU-only setup for SemEval-2026 Task 13.
-
mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Finetuning LLMs for Conspiracy Detection
Finetuning Qwen3-32B with data augmentation and self-training achieves competitive 8th-place ranking on SemEval-2026 conspiracy detection.
-
mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 9: Finetuning LLMs for Multilingual Polarization Detection
Finetuning LLMs with QLoRA and multilingual data augmentation for polarization detection, type, and manifestation in SemEval-2026 Task 9.
-
mcdok at SemEval-2026 Task 13: Finetuning LLMs for Detection of Machine-Generated Code
Fine-tuning LLMs by adapting the mdok approach produces competitive results on binary detection, source attribution, and hybrid/adversarial code identification in SemEval-2026 Task 13.
- Psychologically Potent, Computationally Invisible: LLMs Generate Social-Comparison-Eliciting Posts They Fail to Detect