Transformers on impossible-language variants show gradual grammatical sensitivity loss but sharp long-sentence generation failures, supporting generative deficiency as a link to non-attestation.
Sentence-Level Fluency Evaluation: References Help, But Can Be Spared!
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 4years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Summing outputs from separately trained QLoRA PEFT modules provides strong performance for attribute-controlled text generation, often matching or exceeding single-task modules even on single-attribute tests.
Later LLM layers align better with human cognitive effort in syntactic ambiguity than early layers do, indicating dual processing modes and complementary benefits from multi-layer probability updates.
Re-evaluating controlled text generation systems under standardized conditions reveals that many published performance claims do not hold, highlighting the need for consistent evaluation practices.
citing papers explorer
-
When transformers learn "impossible" languages, what do they learn?
Transformers on impossible-language variants show gradual grammatical sensitivity loss but sharp long-sentence generation failures, supporting generative deficiency as a link to non-attestation.
-
Output Composability of QLoRA PEFT Modules for Plug-and-Play Attribute-Controlled Text Generation
Summing outputs from separately trained QLoRA PEFT modules provides strong performance for attribute-controlled text generation, often matching or exceeding single-task modules even on single-attribute tests.
-
Dual Alignment Between Language Model Layers and Human Sentence Processing
Later LLM layers align better with human cognitive effort in syntactic ambiguity than early layers do, indicating dual processing modes and complementary benefits from multi-layer probability updates.
-
A Comparative Study of Controlled Text Generation Systems Using Level-Playing-Field Evaluation Principles
Re-evaluating controlled text generation systems under standardized conditions reveals that many published performance claims do not hold, highlighting the need for consistent evaluation practices.