Stoquastic Sparse Hamiltonians is StoqMA-complete and its separable version is StoqMA(2)-complete.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
method 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
StoqMA(2) contains NP with Õ(√n)-qubit proofs and completeness error 2^{-polylog(n)}, is contained in EXP, and satisfies StoqMA(k)=StoqMA(2) for k≥2 when completeness error is negligible.
RFOX maintains a flat spectral gap via non-stoquastic XX catalyst plus analytic counter-diabatic ZX driving, yielding near-optimal solutions on random-field Ising models with up to 10x fewer Trotter steps.
The 2-local stoquastic Hamiltonian problem on 2D square qubit lattices is StoqMA-complete.
citing papers explorer
-
The Complexity of Stoquastic Sparse Hamiltonians
Stoquastic Sparse Hamiltonians is StoqMA-complete and its separable version is StoqMA(2)-complete.
-
Unentangled stoquastic Merlin-Arthur proof systems: the power of unentanglement without destructive interference
StoqMA(2) contains NP with Õ(√n)-qubit proofs and completeness error 2^{-polylog(n)}, is contained in EXP, and satisfies StoqMA(k)=StoqMA(2) for k≥2 when completeness error is negligible.
-
RFOX (Rotated-Field Oscillatory eXchange) quantum algorithm: Towards Parameter-Free Quantum Optimizers
RFOX maintains a flat spectral gap via non-stoquastic XX catalyst plus analytic counter-diabatic ZX driving, yielding near-optimal solutions on random-field Ising models with up to 10x fewer Trotter steps.
-
The Complexity of Local Stoquastic Hamiltonians on 2D Lattices
The 2-local stoquastic Hamiltonian problem on 2D square qubit lattices is StoqMA-complete.