pith. sign in

arxiv: 0809.2427 · v2 · pith:YJUVQGDSnew · submitted 2008-09-15 · 🧮 math.GR · math.RT

On Coxeter Diagrams of complex reflection groups

classification 🧮 math.GR math.RT
keywords diagramsgroupsalgorithmgroupreflectionlatticesunitarycomplex
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We study Coxeter diagrams of some unitary reflection groups. Using solely the combinatorics of diagrams, we give a new proof of the classification of root lattices defined over $\cE = \ZZ[e^{2 \pi i/3}]$: there are only four such lattices, namely, the $\cE$-lattices whose real forms are $A_2$, $D_4$, $E_6$ and $E_8$. Next, we address the issue of characterizing the diagrams for unitary reflection groups, a question that was raised by Brou\'{e}, Malle and Rouquier. To this end, we describe an algorithm which, given a unitary reflection group $G$, picks out a set of complex reflections. The algorithm is based on an analogy with Weyl groups. If $G$ is a Weyl group, the algorithm immediately yields a set of simple roots. Experimentally we observe that if $G$ is primitive and $G$ has a set of roots whose $\ZZ$--span is a discrete subset of the ambient vector space, then the algorithm selects a minimal generating set for $G$. The group $G$ has a presentation on these generators such that if we forget that the generators have finite order then we get a (Coxeter-like) presentation of the corresponding braid group. For some groups, such as $G_{33}$ and $G_{34}$, new diagrams are obtained. For $G_{34}$, our new diagram extends to an "affine diagram" with $\ZZ/7\ZZ$ symmetry.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.