Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Technical Analysis and Discrete False Discovery Rate: Evidence from MSCI Indices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.06766 v2 pith:QTYAYKCB submitted 2018-11-16 q-fin.ST stat.APstat.ME

classification q-fin.STstat.APstat.ME
keywords technicalanalysisdiscreterulestradingdfrddiscoveryfalse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the performance of dynamic portfolios constructed using more than 21,000 technical trading rules on 12 categorical and country-specific markets over the 2004-2015 study period, on rolling forward structures of different lengths. We also introduce a discrete false discovery rate (DFRD+/-) method for controlling data snooping bias. Compared to the existing methods, DFRD+/- is adaptive and more powerful, and accommodates for discrete p-values. The profitability, persistence and robustness of the technical rules are examined. Technical analysis still has short-term value in advanced, emerging and frontier markets. Financial stress, the economic environment and market development seem to affect the performance of trading rules. A cross-validation exercise highlights the importance of frequent rebalancing and the variability of profitability in trading with technical analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools