Fairness in Clustering with Multiple Sensitive Attributes
Reviewed by Pithpith:DSSJUSFKopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
A clustering may be considered as fair on pre-specified sensitive attributes if the proportions of sensitive attribute groups in each cluster reflect that in the dataset. In this paper, we consider the task of fair clustering for scenarios involving multiple multi-valued or numeric sensitive attributes. We propose a fair clustering method, \textit{FairKM} (Fair K-Means), that is inspired by the popular K-Means clustering formulation. We outline a computational notion of fairness which is used along with a cluster coherence objective, to yield the FairKM clustering method. We empirically evaluate our approach, wherein we quantify both the quality and fairness of clusters, over real-world datasets. Our experimental evaluation illustrates that the clusters generated by FairKM fare significantly better on both clustering quality and fair representation of sensitive attribute groups compared to the clusters from a state-of-the-art baseline fair clustering method.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FairBED: A Bayesian Experimental Design Approach to Gathering Fairer Data
FairBED quantifies dataset fairness as uninformative about sensitive attributes and uses fairness-aware BED to gather data yielding better fairness-accuracy trade-offs than random or standard BED acquisition.
-
Fast and effective algorithms for fair clustering at scale
A framework plus three heuristics for fair clustering that give precise cost-fairness control and scale to millions of objects while beating existing solvers on benchmark data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.