Supplementary information for "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor"
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:7OWB7TSJrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
This is an updated version of supplementary information to accompany "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor", an article published in the October 24, 2019 issue of Nature. The main article is freely available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5. Summary of changes since arXiv:1910.11333v1 (submitted 23 Oct 2019): added URL for qFlex source code; added Erratum section; added Figure S41 comparing statistical and total uncertainty for log and linear XEB; new References [1,65]; miscellaneous updates for clarity and style consistency; miscellaneous typographical and formatting corrections.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Non-stabilizerness and U(1) symmetry in chaotic many-body quantum systems
Exact results show U(1) symmetry substantially suppresses non-stabilizerness in random states, with different leading scaling from entanglement near zero charge density.
-
Quantum Magic in early FTQC: From Diagonal Clifford Hierarchy No-Go Theorems to Architecture Design Blueprints
No-go theorems prove hierarchy level and state-independent sequences cannot maximize operational magic in early FTQC, requiring state-aware differentiable optimization and nonlinear phases for scalable magic generation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.