pith. sign in

arxiv: 1911.05202 · v1 · pith:MXCHA4PLnew · submitted 2019-11-12 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Creating Auxiliary Representations from Charge Definitions for Criminal Charge Prediction

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords chargefactdefinitionsdescriptionsauxiliaryclassescriminalprediction
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Charge prediction, determining charges for criminal cases by analyzing the textual fact descriptions, is a promising technology in legal assistant systems. In practice, the fact descriptions could exhibit a significant intra-class variation due to factors like non-normative use of language, which makes the prediction task very challenging, especially for charge classes with too few samples to cover the expression variation. In this work, we explore to use the charge definitions from criminal law to alleviate this issue. The key idea is that the expressions in a fact description should have corresponding formal terms in charge definitions, and those terms are shared across classes and could account for the diversity in the fact descriptions. Thus, we propose to create auxiliary fact representations from charge definitions to augment fact descriptions representation. The generated auxiliary representations are created through the interaction of fact description with the relevant charge definitions and terms in those definitions by integrated sentence- and word-level attention scheme. Experimental results on two datasets show that our model achieves significant improvement than baselines, especially for classes with few samples.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enhancing Judgment Document Generation via Agentic Legal Information Collection and Rubric-Guided Optimization

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Judge-R1 improves LLM judgment document generation by combining agentic legal information retrieval with GRPO-based rubric-guided optimization, outperforming baselines on the JuDGE benchmark.