pith. sign in

arxiv: 1912.02675 · v1 · pith:GJL5ITXZnew · submitted 2019-12-05 · 💻 cs.CY

In AI We Trust? Factors That Influence Trustworthiness of AI-infused Decision-Making Processes

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords decision-makingfactorsmodelprocessdecisioninfluenceai-infuseddifferent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Many decision-making processes have begun to incorporate an AI element, including prison sentence recommendations, college admissions, hiring, and mortgage approval. In all of these cases, AI models are being trained to help human decision makers reach accurate and fair judgments, but little is known about what factors influence the extent to which people consider an AI-infused decision-making process to be trustworthy. We aim to understand how different factors about a decision-making process, and an AI model that supports that process, influences peoples' perceptions of the trustworthiness of that process. We report on our evaluation of how seven different factors -- decision stakes, decision authority, model trainer, model interpretability, social transparency, and model confidence -- influence ratings of trust in a scenario-based study.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CANote: Empowering Fact-checking Note Writing Through Scaffolded and Provenance-based Human-AI Collaboration

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CANote is an AI-assisted tool that scaffolds fact-checking note writing via subclaim extraction, provenance links, and neutral drafts, with user studies showing improved quality and lay users matching experts.