Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.14480 v1 pith:2C3ILFQJ submitted 2020-04-27 cs.LG stat.ML

Calibrating Healthcare AI: Towards Reliable and Interpretable Deep Predictive Models

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords modelreliabilityaddressedapproachbehaviorinterpretabilitylearningneed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The wide-spread adoption of representation learning technologies in clinical decision making strongly emphasizes the need for characterizing model reliability and enabling rigorous introspection of model behavior. While the former need is often addressed by incorporating uncertainty quantification strategies, the latter challenge is addressed using a broad class of interpretability techniques. In this paper, we argue that these two objectives are not necessarily disparate and propose to utilize prediction calibration to meet both objectives. More specifically, our approach is comprised of a calibration-driven learning method, which is also used to design an interpretability technique based on counterfactual reasoning. Furthermore, we introduce \textit{reliability plots}, a holistic evaluation mechanism for model reliability. Using a lesion classification problem with dermoscopy images, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and infer interesting insights about the model behavior.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.