The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2009.07091 · v3 · pith:XNYEEGFQ · submitted 2020-09-15 · cs.CR · cs.AR

A Systematic Study of Lattice-based NIST PQC Algorithms: from Reference Implementations to Hardware Accelerators

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:XNYEEGFQrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CR cs.AR
keywords algorithmsacceleratorsalgorithmcandidatehardwarelattice-basednistreference
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Security of currently deployed public key cryptography algorithms is foreseen to be vulnerable against quantum computer attacks. Hence, a community effort exists to develop post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms, i.e., algorithms that are resistant to quantum attacks. In this work, we have investigated how lattice-based candidate algorithms from the NIST PQC standardization competition fare when conceived as hardware accelerators. To achieve this, we have assessed the reference implementations of selected algorithms with the goal of identifying what are their basic building blocks. We assume the hardware accelerators will be implemented in application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) and the targeted technology in our experiments is a commercial 65nm node. In order to estimate the characteristics of each algorithm, we have assessed their memory requirements, use of multipliers, and how each algorithm employs hashing functions. Furthermore, for these building blocks, we have collected area and power figures for 12 candidate algorithms. For memories, we make use of a commercial memory compiler. For logic, we make use of a standard cell library. In order to compare the candidate algorithms fairly, we select a reference frequency of operation of 500MHz. Our results reveal that our area and power numbers are comparable to the state of the art, despite targeting a higher frequency of operation and a higher security level in our experiments. The comprehensive investigation of lattice-based NIST PQC algorithms performed in this paper can be used for guiding ASIC designers when selecting an appropriate algorithm while respecting requirements and design constraints.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Faster than Fast-LTS: Robust Regression and Outlier Detection with DC Programming

    math.OC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes sBDCA with preconditioning for the LTS estimator, claiming up to 3.25 times faster runtime and up to 90% lower objective values than Fast-LTS on synthetic and real data.