The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2011.07030 · v1 · pith:GIPYR24K · submitted 2020-11-13 · stat.ME · stat.AP

Contextualizing E-values for Interpretable Sensitivity to Unmeasured Confounding Analyses

Reviewed by Pithpith:GIPYR24Kopen to challenge →

classification stat.ME stat.AP
keywords observedconfoundinge-valuee-valuessensitivityunmeasuredanalysisbias
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The strength of evidence provided by epidemiological and observational studies is inherently limited by the potential for unmeasured confounding. Researchers should present a quantified sensitivity to unmeasured confounding analysis that is contextualized by the study's observed covariates. VanderWeele and Ding's E-value provides an easily calculated metric for the magnitude of the hypothetical unmeasured confounding required to render the study's result inconclusive. We propose the Observed Covariate E-value to contextualize the sensitivity analysis' hypothetical E-value within the actual impact of observed covariates, individually or within groups. We introduce a sensitivity analysis figure that presents the Observed Covariate E-values, on the E-value scale, next to their corresponding observed bias effects, on the original scale of the study results. This observed bias plot allows easy comparison of the hypothetical E-values, Observed Covariate E-values, and observed bias effects. We illustrate the methods with a specific example and provide a supplemental appendix with modifiable code that teaches how to implement the method and create a publication quality figure.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.