Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.00219 v1 pith:FUOHVNI6 submitted 2021-07-31 cs.LG cs.AI

Grain: Improving Data Efficiency of Graph Neural Networks via Diversified Influence Maximization

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords dataselectiongnnsinfluenceefficiencygrainlearningmaximization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data selection methods, such as active learning and core-set selection, are useful tools for improving the data efficiency of deep learning models on large-scale datasets. However, recent deep learning models have moved forward from independent and identically distributed data to graph-structured data, such as social networks, e-commerce user-item graphs, and knowledge graphs. This evolution has led to the emergence of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that go beyond the models existing data selection methods are designed for. Therefore, we present Grain, an efficient framework that opens up a new perspective through connecting data selection in GNNs with social influence maximization. By exploiting the common patterns of GNNs, Grain introduces a novel feature propagation concept, a diversified influence maximization objective with novel influence and diversity functions, and a greedy algorithm with an approximation guarantee into a unified framework. Empirical studies on public datasets demonstrate that Grain significantly improves both the performance and efficiency of data selection (including active learning and core-set selection) for GNNs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to bridge two largely parallel threads of research, data selection, and social influence maximization, in the setting of GNNs, paving new ways for improving data efficiency.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Real vs. Semi-Simulated: Rethinking Evaluation for Treatment Effect Estimation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Counterfactual metrics on semi-simulated benchmarks fail to identify the treatment effect estimators preferred by observable metrics on real datasets, with simple meta-learners outperforming specialized causal models.

  2. Real vs. Semi-Simulated: Rethinking Evaluation for Treatment Effect Estimation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Large-scale study finds that counterfactual metrics on semi-simulated data do not select the same estimators as observable metrics on real data, and benchmark rankings fail to transfer.