pith. sign in

arxiv: 2112.06288 · v1 · pith:SMU5D2IJ · submitted 2021-12-12 · cs.LG · cs.CY· stat.ML

Fairness for Robust Learning to Rank

pith:SMU5D2IJopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.CYstat.ML
keywords rankingutilityfairnesswhilerankingssystemsachieveadditionally
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

While conventional ranking systems focus solely on maximizing the utility of the ranked items to users, fairness-aware ranking systems additionally try to balance the exposure for different protected attributes such as gender or race. To achieve this type of group fairness for ranking, we derive a new ranking system based on the first principles of distributional robustness. We formulate a minimax game between a player choosing a distribution over rankings to maximize utility while satisfying fairness constraints against an adversary seeking to minimize utility while matching statistics of the training data. We show that our approach provides better utility for highly fair rankings than existing baseline methods.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scoring Is Not Enough: Addressing Gaps in Utility-fairness Trade-offs for Ranking

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Scoring functions are sub-optimal for all utility-fairness trade-offs in ranking under a generic fairness formulation, but semi-greedy post-processing can approach the performance of exhaustive post-processing.