The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2204.02380 · v1 · pith:J4EZU4KN · submitted 2022-04-05 · cs.CV · cs.CL

CLEVR-X: A Visual Reasoning Dataset for Natural Language Explanations

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:J4EZU4KNrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV cs.CL
keywords explanationsclevr-xdatasetlanguagenaturalquestionvisualanswer
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Providing explanations in the context of Visual Question Answering (VQA) presents a fundamental problem in machine learning. To obtain detailed insights into the process of generating natural language explanations for VQA, we introduce the large-scale CLEVR-X dataset that extends the CLEVR dataset with natural language explanations. For each image-question pair in the CLEVR dataset, CLEVR-X contains multiple structured textual explanations which are derived from the original scene graphs. By construction, the CLEVR-X explanations are correct and describe the reasoning and visual information that is necessary to answer a given question. We conducted a user study to confirm that the ground-truth explanations in our proposed dataset are indeed complete and relevant. We present baseline results for generating natural language explanations in the context of VQA using two state-of-the-art frameworks on the CLEVR-X dataset. Furthermore, we provide a detailed analysis of the explanation generation quality for different question and answer types. Additionally, we study the influence of using different numbers of ground-truth explanations on the convergence of natural language generation (NLG) metrics. The CLEVR-X dataset is publicly available at \url{https://explainableml.github.io/CLEVR-X/}.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CurveBench: A Benchmark for Exact Topological Reasoning over Nested Jordan Curves

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CurveBench benchmark reveals that even leading VLMs like Gemini 3.1 Pro reach only 71.1% accuracy recovering containment trees on easy nested-curve images and 19.1% on hard versions, while fine-tuning lifts an open 8B...

  2. CurveBench: A Benchmark for Exact Topological Reasoning over Nested Jordan Curves

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CurveBench is a new benchmark for recovering rooted containment trees from images of nested Jordan curves, where the strongest model reaches only 19.1% accuracy on hard cases and fine-tuning lifts an open model to 33....