CLEVR-X: A Visual Reasoning Dataset for Natural Language Explanations
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:J4EZU4KNrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Providing explanations in the context of Visual Question Answering (VQA) presents a fundamental problem in machine learning. To obtain detailed insights into the process of generating natural language explanations for VQA, we introduce the large-scale CLEVR-X dataset that extends the CLEVR dataset with natural language explanations. For each image-question pair in the CLEVR dataset, CLEVR-X contains multiple structured textual explanations which are derived from the original scene graphs. By construction, the CLEVR-X explanations are correct and describe the reasoning and visual information that is necessary to answer a given question. We conducted a user study to confirm that the ground-truth explanations in our proposed dataset are indeed complete and relevant. We present baseline results for generating natural language explanations in the context of VQA using two state-of-the-art frameworks on the CLEVR-X dataset. Furthermore, we provide a detailed analysis of the explanation generation quality for different question and answer types. Additionally, we study the influence of using different numbers of ground-truth explanations on the convergence of natural language generation (NLG) metrics. The CLEVR-X dataset is publicly available at \url{https://explainableml.github.io/CLEVR-X/}.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CurveBench: A Benchmark for Exact Topological Reasoning over Nested Jordan Curves
CurveBench benchmark reveals that even leading VLMs like Gemini 3.1 Pro reach only 71.1% accuracy recovering containment trees on easy nested-curve images and 19.1% on hard versions, while fine-tuning lifts an open 8B...
-
CurveBench: A Benchmark for Exact Topological Reasoning over Nested Jordan Curves
CurveBench is a new benchmark for recovering rooted containment trees from images of nested Jordan curves, where the strongest model reaches only 19.1% accuracy on hard cases and fine-tuning lifts an open model to 33....
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.