Data Splits and Metrics for Method Benchmarking on Surgical Action Triplet Datasets
read the original abstract
In addition to generating data and annotations, devising sensible data splitting strategies and evaluation metrics is essential for the creation of a benchmark dataset. This practice ensures consensus on the usage of the data, homogeneous assessment, and uniform comparison of research methods on the dataset. This study focuses on CholecT50, which is a 50 video surgical dataset that formalizes surgical activities as triplets of <instrument, verb, target>. In this paper, we introduce the standard splits for the CholecT50 and CholecT45 datasets and show how they compare with existing use of the dataset. CholecT45 is the first public release of 45 videos of CholecT50 dataset. We also develop a metrics library, ivtmetrics, for model evaluation on surgical triplets. Furthermore, we conduct a benchmark study by reproducing baseline methods in the most predominantly used deep learning frameworks (PyTorch and TensorFlow) to evaluate them using the proposed data splits and metrics and release them publicly to support future research. The proposed data splits and evaluation metrics will enable global tracking of research progress on the dataset and facilitate optimal model selection for further deployment.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Grounding Surgical Action Triplets with Instrument Instance Segmentation: A Dataset and Target-Aware Fusion Approach
Introduces the triplet segmentation task, CholecTriplet-Seg dataset with over 30,000 frames, and TargetFusionNet architecture extending Mask2Former for instance-level grounding of surgical <instrument, verb, target> triplets.
-
Current validation practice undermines surgical AI development
A multi-stage Delphi consensus with 92 experts catalogs widespread validation pitfalls in surgical AI video analysis across data, metrics, and reporting, supported by a systematic review and empirical experiments.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.