πBO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimization
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:Q32JWNSIrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Bayesian optimization (BO) has become an established framework and popular tool for hyperparameter optimization (HPO) of machine learning (ML) algorithms. While known for its sample-efficiency, vanilla BO can not utilize readily available prior beliefs the practitioner has on the potential location of the optimum. Thus, BO disregards a valuable source of information, reducing its appeal to ML practitioners. To address this issue, we propose $\pi$BO, an acquisition function generalization which incorporates prior beliefs about the location of the optimum in the form of a probability distribution, provided by the user. In contrast to previous approaches, $\pi$BO is conceptually simple and can easily be integrated with existing libraries and many acquisition functions. We provide regret bounds when $\pi$BO is applied to the common Expected Improvement acquisition function and prove convergence at regular rates independently of the prior. Further, our experiments show that $\pi$BO outperforms competing approaches across a wide suite of benchmarks and prior characteristics. We also demonstrate that $\pi$BO improves on the state-of-the-art performance for a popular deep learning task, with a 12.5 $\times$ time-to-accuracy speedup over prominent BO approaches.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Regime-Conditioned Evaluation in Multi-Context Bayesian Optimization
The Portable Regime Score PRS=(B/|A|)(1-rho) captures and predicts acquisition function performance reversals in transfer Bayesian optimization, enabling a RegimePlanner that adapts and beats fixed baselines.
-
Collaborative Contextual Bayesian Optimization
CCBO enables collaborative contextual Bayesian optimization across clients with sublinear regret guarantees and shows substantial gains over non-collaborative methods in simulations and a hot rolling application even ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.