The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2205.15683 · v1 · pith:KZYF6UUH · submitted 2022-05-31 · cs.CL · cs.AI

Why are NLP Models Fumbling at Elementary Math? A Survey of Deep Learning based Word Problem Solvers

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:KZYF6UUHrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords wordmathmodelsproblemsbeendeepelementaryinterest
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

From the latter half of the last decade, there has been a growing interest in developing algorithms for automatically solving mathematical word problems (MWP). It is a challenging and unique task that demands blending surface level text pattern recognition with mathematical reasoning. In spite of extensive research, we are still miles away from building robust representations of elementary math word problems and effective solutions for the general task. In this paper, we critically examine the various models that have been developed for solving word problems, their pros and cons and the challenges ahead. In the last two years, a lot of deep learning models have recorded competing results on benchmark datasets, making a critical and conceptual analysis of literature highly useful at this juncture. We take a step back and analyse why, in spite of this abundance in scholarly interest, the predominantly used experiment and dataset designs continue to be a stumbling block. From the vantage point of having analyzed the literature closely, we also endeavour to provide a road-map for future math word problem research.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Artificial Intelligence for Mathematical Reasoning: An Integrated Survey of Language Models, Neuro-symbolic Systems, and Verified Discovery

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    An integrated survey organizing AI mathematical reasoning into informal, formal, discovery, and technique axes while cataloging benchmarks and assessing failure modes.