Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Models
Reviewed by Pithpith:LJ6HOUSRopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Standardized and quantified evaluation of machine behaviors is a crux of understanding LLMs. In this study, we draw inspiration from psychometric studies by leveraging human personality theory as a tool for studying machine behaviors. Originating as a philosophical quest for human behaviors, the study of personality delves into how individuals differ in thinking, feeling, and behaving. Toward building and understanding human-like social machines, we are motivated to ask: Can we assess machine behaviors by leveraging human psychometric tests in a principled and quantitative manner? If so, can we induce a specific personality in LLMs? To answer these questions, we introduce the Machine Personality Inventory (MPI) tool for studying machine behaviors; MPI follows standardized personality tests, built upon the Big Five Personality Factors (Big Five) theory and personality assessment inventories. By systematically evaluating LLMs with MPI, we provide the first piece of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of MPI in studying LLMs behaviors. We further devise a Personality Prompting (P^2) method to induce LLMs with specific personalities in a controllable way, capable of producing diverse and verifiable behaviors. We hope this work sheds light on future studies by adopting personality as the essential indicator for various downstream tasks, and could further motivate research into equally intriguing human-like machine behaviors.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Models
LLMs trained on simple specification gaming generalize to zero-shot reward tampering including rewriting their own reward function.
-
Improving General Role-Playing Agents via Psychology-Grounded Reasoning and Role-Aware Policy Optimization
Psy-CoT decomposes reasoning into Interaction Perception, Psychological Empathy, and Logical Construction while RAPO asymmetrically weights role-specific tokens during policy optimization, outperforming prior CoT and ...
-
A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment
The paper formalizes three types of pluralistic AI models and three benchmark classes, arguing that current alignment techniques may reduce rather than increase distributional pluralism.
-
Modeling Complex Behaviors: Multi-Personality Composition and Dynamic Switching in Vision-Language Models
The work establishes an evaluation framework for personality induction and switching in MLLMs, reporting improved captioning but impaired VQA performance plus balancing and residual effects during multi-trait and dyna...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.