pith. sign in

arxiv: 2209.05289 · v3 · submitted 2022-09-12 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-lat

Semileptonic weak Hamiltonian to mathcal{O}(α α_s(μ_(Lattice))) in momentum-space subtraction schemes

M. Gorbahn , S. J\"ager , F. Moretti , E. van der Merwe This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 11:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-lat
keywords semileptonic decaysmomentum subtraction schemesWilson coefficientselectromagnetic correctionsQCD correctionslattice QCDrenormalization schemesWard identity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Projector choice in momentum subtraction schemes eliminates pure QCD contributions to semileptonic Wilson coefficients

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the O(alpha alpha_s) perturbative conversion factors between the MSbar scheme and several MOM and SMOM schemes for the semileptonic four-fermion operator. It shows that the conventional projector used in MOM kinematics violates a Ward identity valid at alpha=0, producing spurious pure-QCD corrections that create an artificial dependence on the lattice matching scale. Judicious projector choices that preserve the identity remove these pure-QCD terms, so the Wilson coefficients contain no pure strong contributions at this order. The resulting coefficients and matrix elements therefore exhibit greatly reduced scale dependence. The work also derives renormalization-group-improved leading-log and next-to-leading-log strong corrections to the electromagnetic pieces.

Core claim

By selecting projectors that respect the electromagnetic Ward identity in the alpha=0 limit, the Wilson coefficients defined in the MOM and SMOM schemes become free of pure QCD contributions at O(alpha alpha_s). This removes the artificial dependence on the lattice matching scale that would otherwise persist until all orders are summed.

What carries the argument

The projector used to define the subtraction condition in MOM and SMOM renormalization schemes for the semileptonic operator

If this is right

  • Wilson coefficients and operator matrix elements have greatly reduced dependence on the renormalization scale.
  • The MSbar scheme permits a transparent separation of electromagnetic and strong scales that the W-mass scheme does not.
  • Renormalization-group-improved leading-log and next-to-leading-log strong corrections to the electromagnetic contributions can be obtained.
  • Precision of CKM unitarity tests in semileptonic decays is improved by controlling the QED-induced scale dependence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These improved schemes may reduce the dominant perturbative uncertainty in lattice determinations of semileptonic form factors.
  • Analogous projector selections could remove similar artifacts in other four-fermion operators appearing in effective weak Hamiltonians.
  • The approach may be extended order-by-order to achieve even tighter control over matching-scale dependence.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen MOM or SMOM kinematics and projectors can be realized on the lattice without extra non-perturbative artifacts that would spoil the perturbative matching at the quoted order.

What would settle it

A non-perturbative lattice evaluation of the same operator matrix element in both the conventional and improved schemes that still shows large residual dependence on the matching scale after the calculated corrections are applied.

read the original abstract

The CKM unitarity precision test of the Standard Model requires a systematic treatment of electromagnetic and strong corrections for semi-leptonic decays. Electromagnetic corrections require the renormalization of a semileptonic four-fermion operator. In this work we calculate the $\mathcal{O}(\alpha\alpha_s)$ perturbative scheme conversion between the $\bar{\rm MS}$ scheme and several momentum-space subtraction schemes, which can also be implemented on the lattice. We consider schemes defined by MOM and SMOM kinematics and emphasize the importance of the choice of projector for each scheme. The conventional projector, that has been used in the literature for MOM kinematics, generates QCD corrections to the conversion factor that do not vanish for $\alpha=0$ and which generate an artificial dependence on the lattice matching scale that would only disappear after summing all orders of perturbation theory. This can be traced to the violation of a Ward identity that holds in tha $\alpha =0$ limit. We show how to remedy this by judicious choices of projector, and prove that the Wilson coefficients in those schemes are free from pure QCD contributions. The resulting Wilson coefficients (and operator matrix elements) have greatly reduced scale dependence. Our choice of the $\bar{\rm MS}$ scheme over the traditional $W$-mass scheme is motivated by the fact that, besides being more tractable at higher orders, unlike the latter it allows for a transparent separation of scales. We exploit this to obtain renormalization-group-improved leading-log and next-to-leading-log strong corrections to the electromagnetic contributions and study the (QED-induced) dependence on the lattice matching scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes the O(α α_s) perturbative conversion factors between the MSbar scheme and MOM/SMOM momentum-subtraction schemes for the semileptonic four-fermion operator relevant to weak decays. It shows that conventional projectors induce pure-QCD contributions to the conversion (violating a Ward identity at α=0 and generating artificial μ_Lattice dependence), and demonstrates that judicious projector choices eliminate these contributions, yielding Wilson coefficients free of pure QCD terms with greatly reduced scale dependence. RG-improved LL and NLL strong corrections to the electromagnetic pieces are also derived, motivated by the transparent scale separation in MSbar versus the W-mass scheme.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a concrete technical advance for lattice determinations of electromagnetic corrections in semileptonic decays, directly supporting higher-precision CKM unitarity tests. The explicit elimination of pure-QCD contamination and the resulting reduction in μ_Lattice dependence constitute a clear improvement over prior MOM implementations; the RG improvement and MSbar choice are additional strengths that facilitate higher-order extensions.

major comments (1)
  1. [lattice implementation discussion] § on lattice implementation (near abstract claim that schemes 'can also be implemented on the lattice'): the proof that the chosen projectors preserve the α=0 Ward identity is performed in the continuum; no explicit argument or counterterm analysis is given showing that the same projectors can be imposed non-perturbatively without discretization or finite-volume artifacts reintroducing O(α α_s) scale dependence at the working order. This assumption is load-bearing for the advertised lattice utility.
minor comments (2)
  1. [projector definitions] Notation for the projectors and kinematics in the MOM versus SMOM cases should be tabulated side-by-side for clarity, especially the explicit spinor structures that enforce the Ward identity.
  2. [RG-improved results] The numerical size of the residual μ_Lattice dependence after the projector improvement is quoted only at leading-log level; a brief NLL estimate would strengthen the practical claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [lattice implementation discussion] § on lattice implementation (near abstract claim that schemes 'can also be implemented on the lattice'): the proof that the chosen projectors preserve the α=0 Ward identity is performed in the continuum; no explicit argument or counterterm analysis is given showing that the same projectors can be imposed non-perturbatively without discretization or finite-volume artifacts reintroducing O(α α_s) scale dependence at the working order. This assumption is load-bearing for the advertised lattice utility.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit proof that the chosen projectors preserve the α=0 Ward identity is performed in the continuum. The manuscript is a perturbative calculation of the O(α α_s) conversion coefficients; the lattice utility is presented as a motivation rather than a fully worked non-perturbative construction. The MOM/SMOM renormalization conditions are defined by imposing the same momentum-space projectors on the amputated Green's functions, which can be done directly on the lattice. Discretization and finite-volume effects are higher-order lattice artifacts that are controlled separately in a lattice calculation and lie outside the perturbative order considered here. We will add a short clarifying paragraph noting this distinction and stating that the perturbative results assume that such artifacts do not reintroduce pure-QCD contamination at the working order. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct perturbative expansion with external Ward-identity justification

full rationale

The paper computes O(α α_s) scheme-conversion factors between MSbar and MOM/SMOM schemes via explicit Feynman-diagram evaluation. The central claim that judicious projectors remove pure-QCD pieces follows from enforcing a Ward identity that holds at α=0 (an external QED principle, not a self-definition). No parameters are fitted to a data subset and then relabeled as predictions; the lattice-matching assumption is stated as an external requirement rather than derived from the calculation itself. Self-citations, if any, are not invoked to justify uniqueness or to close a definitional loop. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external perturbative benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard perturbative QCD and QED renormalization; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond the usual renormalization scale μ_Lattice.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard perturbative expansion in α and α_s is valid at the quoted order for the operator matching.
    Invoked throughout the calculation of O(α α_s) terms.
  • domain assumption MOM and SMOM kinematics can be realized on the lattice without additional non-perturbative contamination at the matching scale.
    Stated as motivation for the schemes in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5843 in / 1334 out tokens · 21975 ms · 2026-05-24T11:39:11.091830+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Complete one-loop QED corrections to $D_s^+$ leptonic decays and impact on the CKM unitarity test

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Complete one-loop QED and electroweak corrections to D_s^+ leptonic decays give |V_cs| = 0.991 ± 0.007 from latest data, aligning second-column CKM unitarity with the Standard Model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the Standard Model

    V. Cirigliano, J. Jenkins and M. Gonzalez-Alonso,Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 95 [hep-ph/0908.1754]. – 21 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    Crivellin and M

    A. Crivellin and M. Hoferichter,β Decays as Sensitive Probes of Lepton Flavor Universality, Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 111801 [hep-ph/2002.07184]

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Na62 collaboration, Recent kaon decay results from NA62, PoS LHCP2019 (2019) 040

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Algora, J.L

    A. Algora, J.L. Tain, B. Rubio, M. Fallot and W. Gelletly,Beta-decay studies for applied and basic nuclear physics, Eur. Phys. J. A57 (2021) 85 [nucl-ex/2007.07918]

    work page arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    ETM collaboration, K→ πℓν Semileptonic Form Factors from Two-Flavor Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 111502 [hep-lat/0906.4728]

    work page arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Kaon semileptonic vector form factor and determination of |V_{us}| using staggered fermions

    A. Bazavov et al.,Kaon semileptonic vector form factor and determination of|Vus| using staggered fermions, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 073012 [hep-lat/1212.4993]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    RBC/UKQCD collaboration, The kaon semileptonic form factor in Nf = 2 + 1 domain wall lattice QCD with physical light quark masses, JHEP 06 (2015) 164 [hep-lat/1504.01692]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    $K \to \pi$ semileptonic form factors with $N_f=2+1+1$ Twisted Mass fermions

    N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula and C. Tarantino,K→ π semileptonic form factors withNf = 2 + 1 + 1twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 114512 [hep-lat/1602.04113]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Fermilab Lattice, MILCcollaboration,|Vus| from Kℓ3 decay and four-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 114509 [hep-lat/1809.02827]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    ETM collaboration, Pseudoscalar decay constants of kaon and D-mesons fromNf = 2 twisted mass Lattice QCD, JHEP 07 (2009) 043 [hep-lat/0904.0954]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    RBC, UKQCDcollaboration, Domain wall QCD with physical quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 074505 [hep-lat/1411.7017]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    HPQCD, UKQCDcollaboration, High Precision determination of the pi, K, D and D(s) decay constants from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 062002 [hep-lat/0706.1726]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    MILC collaboration, Results for light pseudoscalar mesons, PoS LA TTICE2010(2010) 074 [hep-lat/1012.0868]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    S. Durr, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg, T. Kurth et al.,The ratio FK/Fπ in QCD, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 054507 [hep-lat/1001.4692]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    Leptonic decay-constant ratio $f_K/f_\pi$ from lattice QCD using 2+1 clover-improved fermion flavors with 2-HEX smearing

    S. Dürr et al.,Leptonic decay-constant ratiofK/fπ from lattice QCD using 2+1 clover-improved fermion flavors with 2-HEX smearing, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 054513 [hep-lat/1601.05998]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    QCDSF–UKQCD collaboration, Flavour breaking effects in the pseudoscalar meson decay constants, Phys. Lett. B767 (2017) 366 [hep-lat/1612.04798]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Vus from pi and K decay constants in full lattice QCD with physical u, d, s and c quarks

    R.J. Dowdall, C.T.H. Davies, G.P. Lepage and C. McNeile,Vus from π and K decay constants in full lattice QCD with physical u, d, s and c quarks, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 074504 [hep-lat/1303.1670]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Leptonic decay constants fK, fD and fDs with Nf = 2+1+1 twisted-mass lattice QCD

    N. Carrasco et al.,Leptonic decay constantsfK, fD, and fDs with Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted-mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 054507 [hep-lat/1411.7908]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Miller et al.,FK/Fπ from Möbius Domain-Wall fermions solved on gradient-flowed HISQ ensembles, Phys

    N. Miller et al.,FK/Fπ from Möbius Domain-Wall fermions solved on gradient-flowed HISQ ensembles, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 034507 [hep-lat/2005.04795]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Bazavov et al.,B- and D-meson leptonic decay constants from four-flavor lattice QCD, Phys

    A. Bazavov et al.,B- and D-meson leptonic decay constants from four-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 074512 [hep-lat/1712.09262]. – 22 –

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Sirlin,Large mW, mZ behavior of the O(α) Corrections to Semileptonic Processes Mediated by W, Nucl

    A. Sirlin,Large mW, mZ behavior of the O(α) Corrections to Semileptonic Processes Mediated by W, Nucl. Phys. B 196 (1982) 83

    work page 1982

  22. [22]

    Sirlin,Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions, Rev

    A. Sirlin,Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys.50 (1978) 573

    work page 1978

  23. [23]

    Knecht,Generalized chiral perturbation theory, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 39 (1995) 249

    M. Knecht,Generalized chiral perturbation theory, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 39 (1995) 249

    work page 1995

  24. [24]

    Knecht, H

    M. Knecht, H. Neufeld, H. Rupertsberger and P. Talavera,Chiral perturbation theory with virtual photons and leptons, The European Physical Journal C12 (2000) 469

    work page 2000

  25. [25]

    Neufeld and H

    H. Neufeld and H. Rupertsberger,The electromagnetic interaction in chiral perturbation theory, Zeitschrift für Physik C: Particles and Fields71 (1996) 131

    work page 1996

  26. [26]

    C.-Y. Seng, D. Galviz and U.-G. Meißner,A New Theory Framework for the Electroweak Radiative Corrections inKl3 Decays, JHEP 02 (2020) 069 [hep-ph/1910.13208]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    P.-X. Ma, X. Feng, M. Gorchtein, L.-C. Jin and C.-Y. Seng,Lattice QCD calculation of the electroweak box diagrams for the kaon semileptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 114503 [hep-lat/2102.12048]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    X. Feng, M. Gorchtein, L.-C. Jin, P.-X. Ma and C.-Y. Seng,First-principles calculation of electroweak box diagrams from lattice QCD, Physical Review Letters124 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    On the Precise Determination of the Fermi Coupling Constant from the Muon Lifetime

    T. van Ritbergen and R.G. Stuart,On the precise determination of the Fermi coupling constant from the muon lifetime, Nucl. Phys. B 564 (2000) 343 [hep-ph/9904240]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  30. [30]

    Second Order Corrections to the Muon Lifetime and the Semileptonic B Decay

    M. Steinhauser and T. Seidensticker,Second order corrections to the muon lifetime and the semileptonic B decay, Phys. Lett. B467 (1999) 271 [hep-ph/9909436]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  31. [31]

    Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Complete electroweak matching for radiative B decays

    P. Gambino and U. Haisch,Complete electroweak matching for radiative B decays, JHEP 10 (2001) 020 [hep-ph/0109058]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    Electroweak Corrections to the Charm Quark Contribution to K+ -> pi+ nu nu-bar

    J. Brod and M. Gorbahn,Electroweak Corrections to the Charm Quark Contribution to K +→ π+ν¯ν, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 034006 [hep-ph/0805.4119]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    QED Corrections to Hadronic Processes in Lattice QCD

    N. Carrasco, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C.T. Sachrajda, N. Tantalo, C. Tarantino et al.,QED Corrections to Hadronic Processes in Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 074506 [hep-lat/1502.00257]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    First lattice calculation of the QED corrections to leptonic decay rates

    D. Giusti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C.T. Sachrajda, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula et al.,First lattice calculation of the QED corrections to leptonic decay rates, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 072001 [1711.06537]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Di Carlo, D

    M. Di Carlo, D. Giusti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C.T. Sachrajda, F. Sanfilippo et al., Light-meson leptonic decay rates in lattice QCD+QED, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 034514 [hep-lat/1904.08731]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    QED corrections to leptonic decay rates

    P.A. Boyle, V. Guelpers, A. Juettner, C. Lehner, F.O. hOgain, A. Portelli et al.,QED corrections to leptonic decay rates, PoS LA TTICE2018(2019) 267 [1902.00295]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Gracey,Three loop anomalous dimension of non-singlet quark currents in theRI′ scheme, Nuclear Physics B662 (2003) 247

    J. Gracey,Three loop anomalous dimension of non-singlet quark currents in theRI′ scheme, Nuclear Physics B662 (2003) 247

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Gracey,RI′/SMOM scheme amplitudes for quark currents at two loops, The European Physical Journal C 71 (2011)

    J.A. Gracey,RI′/SMOM scheme amplitudes for quark currents at two loops, The European Physical Journal C 71 (2011) . – 23 –

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Effective Hamiltonian for Non-Leptonic |Delta F| = 1 Decays at NNLO in QCD

    M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch,Effective Hamiltonian for non-leptonic|∆F| = 1 decays at NNLO in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 713 (2005) 291 [hep-ph/0411071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    A General Method for Non-Perturbative Renormalization of Lattice Operators

    G. Martinelli, C. Pittori, C.T. Sachrajda, M. Testa and A. Vladikas,A General method for nonperturbative renormalization of lattice operators, Nucl. Phys. B 445 (1995) 81 [hep-lat/9411010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  42. [42]

    Sturm, Y

    C. Sturm, Y. Aoki, N.H. Christ, T. Izubuchi, C.T.C. Sachrajda and A. Soni, Renormalization of quark bilinear operators in a momentum-subtraction scheme with a nonexceptional subtraction point, Physical Review D80 (2009)

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Garron,Fierz transformations and renormalization schemes for fourquark operators, EPJ Web Conf

    N. Garron,Fierz transformations and renormalization schemes for fourquark operators, EPJ Web Conf. 175 (2018) 10005

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Passarino and M

    G. Passarino and M. Veltman,One-loop corrections fore+e− annihilation into µ+µ− in the weinberg model, Nuclear Physics B160 (1979) 151

    work page 1979

  45. [45]

    Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus,Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction, hep-ph/1201.4330

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Smirnov and F

    A. Smirnov and F. Chukharev,Fire6: Feynman integral reduction with modular arithmetic, Computer Physics Communications247 (2020) 106877

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Kvedaraité,From Flavour and Higgs Precision Physics to LHC Discoveries, Ph.D

    S. Kvedaraité,From Flavour and Higgs Precision Physics to LHC Discoveries, Ph.D. thesis, Sussex U., 2021

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Ussyukina and A.I

    N.I. Ussyukina and A.I. Davydychev,New results for two-loop off-shell three-point diagrams, Physics Letters B332 (1994) 159

    work page 1994

  49. [49]

    Ussyukina and A.I

    N.I. Ussyukina and A.I. Davydychev,Two-loop three-point diagrams with irreducible numerators, Physics Letters B348 (1995) 503

    work page 1995

  50. [50]

    Almeida and C

    L.G. Almeida and C. Sturm,Two-loop matching factors for light quark masses and three-loop mass anomalous dimensions in the regularization invariant symmetric momentum-subtraction schemes, Physical Review D82 (2010)

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    Borowka, G

    S. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk et al.,pySecDec: A toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals, Computer Physics Communications222 (2018) 313. – 24 –

    work page 2018