Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CPL: Counterfactual Prompt Learning for Vision and Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.10362 v3 pith:T2J45XPU submitted 2022-10-19 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords promptlearningcounterfactuallanguagevisionfew-shotmodelstextbf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Prompt tuning is a new few-shot transfer learning technique that only tunes the learnable prompt for pre-trained vision and language models such as CLIP. However, existing prompt tuning methods tend to learn spurious or entangled representations, which leads to poor generalization to unseen concepts. Towards non-spurious and efficient prompt learning from limited examples, this paper presents a novel \underline{\textbf{C}}ounterfactual \underline{\textbf{P}}rompt \underline{\textbf{L}}earning (CPL) method for vision and language models, which simultaneously employs counterfactual generation and contrastive learning in a joint optimization framework. Particularly, CPL constructs counterfactual by identifying minimal non-spurious feature change between semantically-similar positive and negative samples that causes concept change, and learns more generalizable prompt representation from both factual and counterfactual examples via contrastive learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CPL can obtain superior few-shot performance on different vision and language tasks than previous prompt tuning methods on CLIP. On image classification, we achieve 3.55\% average relative improvement on unseen classes across seven datasets; on image-text retrieval and visual question answering, we gain up to 4.09\% and 25.08\% relative improvements across three few-shot scenarios on unseen test sets respectively.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CF-VLM:CounterFactual Vision-Language Fine-tuning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CF-VLM fine-tunes VLMs on counterfactual image-text pairs with three objectives, reporting gains on compositional reasoning benchmarks and modest hallucination reductions.

Pith tools