The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2301.11972 · v2 · pith:I7KVST5L · submitted 2023-01-27 · cs.RO · cs.HC

Using Social Cues to Recognize Task Failures for HRI: Overview, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:I7KVST5Lrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.RO cs.HC
keywords socialcuesfeedbackrobotstaskfailuresdetectionbehavioral
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Robots that carry out tasks and interact in complex environments will inevitably commit errors. Error detection is thus an essential ability for robots to master to work efficiently and productively. People can leverage social feedback to get an indication of whether an action was successful or not. With advances in computing and artificial intelligence (AI), it is increasingly possible for robots to achieve a similar capability of collecting social feedback. In this work, we take this one step further and propose a framework for how social cues can be used as feedback signals to recognize task failures for human-robot interaction (HRI). Our proposed framework sets out a research agenda based on insights from the literature on behavioral science, human-robot interaction, and machine learning to focus on three areas: 1) social cues as feedback (from behavioral science), 2) recognizing task failures in robots (from HRI), and 3) approaches for autonomous detection of HRI task failures based on social cues (from machine learning). We propose a taxonomy of error detection based on self-awareness and social feedback. Finally, we provide recommendations for HRI researchers and practitioners interested in developing robots that detect task errors using human social cues. This article is intended for interdisciplinary HRI researchers and practitioners, where the third theme of our analysis provides more technical details aiming toward the practical implementation of these systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. REPAIR-Bench: A Benchmark for Robot Error Perception And Interaction Recovery

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    REPAIR-Bench provides a new multimodal dataset and three tasks for evaluating longitudinal failure detection, failure-type classification, and user-centered recovery prediction in human-robot interaction.

  2. Designing Robots to Support Parent-Child Connections: Opportunities Through Robot-Mediated Communication

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Robot-mediated communication with passive/reactive/proactive behaviors and synchronous/asynchronous modes enables parent-child exchanges but surfaces tensions in initiative, timing, and privacy while offering opportun...