pith. sign in

arxiv: 2302.04026 · v1 · pith:AZQE4KYR · submitted 2023-02-08 · cs.SE

An Empirical Comparison of Pre-Trained Models of Source Code

pith:AZQE4KYRopen to challenge →

classification cs.SE
keywords modelspre-trainedcodesourcetaskscomparisondifferentempirical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

While a large number of pre-trained models of source code have been successfully developed and applied to a variety of software engineering (SE) tasks in recent years, our understanding of these pre-trained models is arguably fairly limited. With the goal of advancing our understanding of these models, we perform the first systematic empirical comparison of 19 recently-developed pre-trained models of source code on 13 SE tasks. To gain additional insights into these models, we adopt a recently-developed 4-dimensional categorization of pre-trained models, and subsequently investigate whether there are correlations between different categories of pre-trained models and their performances on different SE tasks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large Language Models for Multi-Lingual Equivalent Mutant Detection: An Extended Empirical Study

    cs.SE 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM-based methods achieve higher F1-scores than traditional approaches for equivalent mutant detection in Java and C, with fine-tuned code embeddings performing best and showing cross-lingual generalization.