pith. sign in

arxiv: 2304.04358 · v1 · pith:KX44EKQPnew · submitted 2023-04-10 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

WebBrain: Learning to Generate Factually Correct Articles for Queries by Grounding on Large Web Corpus

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords webbrainwikipediaarticleswebbrain-rawarticleconstructdatasetevidence
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new NLP task -- generating short factual articles with references for queries by mining supporting evidence from the Web. In this task, called WebBrain, the ultimate goal is to generate a fluent, informative, and factually-correct short article (e.g., a Wikipedia article) for a factual query unseen in Wikipedia. To enable experiments on WebBrain, we construct a large-scale dataset WebBrain-Raw by extracting English Wikipedia articles and their crawlable Wikipedia references. WebBrain-Raw is ten times larger than the previous biggest peer dataset, which can greatly benefit the research community. From WebBrain-Raw, we construct two task-specific datasets: WebBrain-R and WebBrain-G, which are used to train in-domain retriever and generator, respectively. Besides, we empirically analyze the performances of the current state-of-the-art NLP techniques on WebBrain and introduce a new framework ReGen, which enhances the generation factualness by improved evidence retrieval and task-specific pre-training for generation. Experiment results show that ReGen outperforms all baselines in both automatic and human evaluations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey

    cs.IR 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces Trust-RAG Compass framework and TRC Bench benchmark to assess RAG trustworthiness across factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy, with evaluations showing performance gap...