pith. sign in

arxiv: 2305.07961 · v2 · pith:MT2N3ODVnew · submitted 2023-05-13 · 💻 cs.IR · cs.CL· cs.LG

Leveraging Large Language Models in Conversational Recommender Systems

classification 💻 cs.IR cs.CLcs.LG
keywords conversationallanguagellmslargeunderstandinguserbuildingconversations
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A Conversational Recommender System (CRS) offers increased transparency and control to users by enabling them to engage with the system through a real-time multi-turn dialogue. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited an unprecedented ability to converse naturally and incorporate world knowledge and common-sense reasoning into language understanding, unlocking the potential of this paradigm. However, effectively leveraging LLMs within a CRS introduces new technical challenges, including properly understanding and controlling a complex conversation and retrieving from external sources of information. These issues are exacerbated by a large, evolving item corpus and a lack of conversational data for training. In this paper, we provide a roadmap for building an end-to-end large-scale CRS using LLMs. In particular, we propose new implementations for user preference understanding, flexible dialogue management and explainable recommendations as part of an integrated architecture powered by LLMs. For improved personalization, we describe how an LLM can consume interpretable natural language user profiles and use them to modulate session-level context. To overcome conversational data limitations in the absence of an existing production CRS, we propose techniques for building a controllable LLM-based user simulator to generate synthetic conversations. As a proof of concept we introduce RecLLM, a large-scale CRS for YouTube videos built on LaMDA, and demonstrate its fluency and diverse functionality through some illustrative example conversations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. One Polluted Page Is Enough: Evaluating Web Content Pollution in Generative Recommenders

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FORGE benchmark shows search-augmented LLMs recommend fake products at rates up to 27% from one polluted page and 73.8% from top-3 replacement across 12 models and 225 products.

  2. Generative Conversational Recommender System

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A single autoregressive model for conversational recommendation that uses semantic item IDs, predicts response intent and target first, then generates the response, reporting up to 29% Recall@1 gains.

  3. Trustworthy Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A systematic review of over 200 studies concludes that LLMs in recommender systems act as a double-edged sword, creating both opportunities and new risks for trustworthiness.

  4. ReRec: Reasoning-Augmented LLM-based Recommendation Assistant via Reinforcement Fine-tuning

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ReRec uses reinforcement fine-tuning with dual-graph reward shaping, reasoning-aware advantage estimation, and online curriculum scheduling to improve LLM reasoning and performance in recommendation tasks.

  5. How Personal Characteristics Shape User Exploration of Diverse Movie Recommendations with a LLM-Based Multi-Agent System

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A multi-agent LLM recommender boosts perceived novelty and diversity in movie suggestions, with effects shaped by user conscientiousness, extraversion, GenAI experience, and skepticism.

  6. Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)

    cs.IR 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A survey proposing a holistic GraphRAG framework with components including query processor, retriever, organizer, generator, and data source, plus domain-tailored reviews, challenges, and future directions.

  7. A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey categorizing scaling in LLM reasoning across input size, steps, rounds, training, and future directions, noting that scaling can negatively affect performance.