Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.15149 v1 pith:X74P3F73 submitted 2023-05-24 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

Reliability Scores from Saliency Map Clusters for Improved Image-based Harvest-Readiness Prediction in Cauliflower

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords reliabilitycauliflowerharvest-readinessaccuracyresultsaliencyscoresclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cauliflower is a hand-harvested crop that must fulfill high-quality standards in sales making the timing of harvest important. However, accurately determining harvest-readiness can be challenging due to the cauliflower head being covered by its canopy. While deep learning enables automated harvest-readiness estimation, errors can occur due to field-variability and limited training data. In this paper, we analyze the reliability of a harvest-readiness classifier with interpretable machine learning. By identifying clusters of saliency maps, we derive reliability scores for each classification result using knowledge about the domain and the image properties. For unseen data, the reliability can be used to (i) inform farmers to improve their decision-making and (ii) increase the model prediction accuracy. Using RGB images of single cauliflower plants at different developmental stages from the GrowliFlower dataset, we investigate various saliency mapping approaches and find that they result in different quality of reliability scores. With the most suitable interpretation tool, we adjust the classification result and achieve a 15.72% improvement of the overall accuracy to 88.14% and a 15.44% improvement of the average class accuracy to 88.52% for the GrowliFlower dataset.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.