pith. sign in

arxiv: 2306.04757 · v3 · pith:3COJXHXTnew · submitted 2023-06-07 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

INSTRUCTEVAL: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords modelsevaluationlanguageinstructevalinstruction-tunedholisticlargealignment
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Instruction-tuned large language models have revolutionized natural language processing and have shown great potential in applications such as conversational agents. These models, such as GPT-4, can not only master language but also solve complex tasks in areas like mathematics, coding, medicine, and law. Despite their impressive capabilities, there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding their full potential, primarily due to the black-box nature of many models and the absence of holistic evaluation studies. To address these challenges, we present INSTRUCTEVAL, a more comprehensive evaluation suite designed specifically for instruction-tuned large language models. Unlike previous works, our evaluation involves a rigorous assessment of models based on problem-solving, writing ability, and alignment to human values. We take a holistic approach to analyze various factors affecting model performance, including the pretraining foundation, instruction-tuning data, and training methods. Our findings reveal that the quality of instruction data is the most crucial factor in scaling model performance. While open-source models demonstrate impressive writing abilities, there is substantial room for improvement in problem-solving and alignment. We are encouraged by the rapid development of models by the open-source community, but we also highlight the need for rigorous evaluation to support claims made about these models. Through INSTRUCTEVAL, we aim to foster a deeper understanding of instruction-tuned models and advancements in their capabilities. INSTRUCTEVAL is publicly available at https://github.com/declare-lab/instruct-eval.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Agreement Metrics for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation: What to Report and Why

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    For binary LLM judge validation, Pearson's r, Spearman's ρ, Kendall's τ_b, phi, and Matthews correlation all equal a single number on non-degenerate data, Cohen's κ supplies the extra signal on label-rate drift, and a...

  2. Design and Report Benchmarks for Knowledge Work

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes a three-step benchmark design method (define work activity, specify tested setting, score work product) derived from work studies and O*NET, demonstrated via three case analyses.

  3. TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Model

    cs.CL 2024-01 accept novelty 4.0

    TinyLlama is a 1.1B-parameter open-source language model pretrained on 1 trillion tokens that outperforms other open-source models of similar size on downstream tasks.