The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2306.11754 · v1 · pith:GTBTRODG · submitted 2023-06-19 · cs.CV · cs.CR· cs.LG

Pre-Pruning and Gradient-Dropping Improve Differentially Private Image Classification

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:GTBTRODGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV cs.CRcs.LG
keywords trainingpre-pruningprivacyaccuracygradient-droppingclassificationimprovemodel
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Scalability is a significant challenge when it comes to applying differential privacy to training deep neural networks. The commonly used DP-SGD algorithm struggles to maintain a high level of privacy protection while achieving high accuracy on even moderately sized models. To tackle this challenge, we take advantage of the fact that neural networks are overparameterized, which allows us to improve neural network training with differential privacy. Specifically, we introduce a new training paradigm that uses \textit{pre-pruning} and \textit{gradient-dropping} to reduce the parameter space and improve scalability. The process starts with pre-pruning the parameters of the original network to obtain a smaller model that is then trained with DP-SGD. During training, less important gradients are dropped, and only selected gradients are updated. Our training paradigm introduces a tension between the rates of pre-pruning and gradient-dropping, privacy loss, and classification accuracy. Too much pre-pruning and gradient-dropping reduces the model's capacity and worsens accuracy, while training a smaller model requires less privacy budget for achieving good accuracy. We evaluate the interplay between these factors and demonstrate the effectiveness of our training paradigm for both training from scratch and fine-tuning pre-trained networks on several benchmark image classification datasets. The tools can also be readily incorporated into existing training paradigms.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Do Fewer Coordinates Suffice in DP-SGD?

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TP-TopK uses private warm-up to select k coordinates for DP-SGD, with a stationarity bound showing noise scales with k (not d) under a given criterion, and experiments on image datasets showing learned supports retain...