pith. sign in

arxiv: 2309.05227 · v1 · pith:QD4VWAODnew · submitted 2023-09-11 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Detecting Natural Language Biases with Prompt-based Learning

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords biasespromptsmodelapplydetectingdifferentexplorejudgment
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this project, we want to explore the newly emerging field of prompt engineering and apply it to the downstream task of detecting LM biases. More concretely, we explore how to design prompts that can indicate 4 different types of biases: (1) gender, (2) race, (3) sexual orientation, and (4) religion-based. Within our project, we experiment with different manually crafted prompts that can draw out the subtle biases that may be present in the language model. We apply these prompts to multiple variations of popular and well-recognized models: BERT, RoBERTa, and T5 to evaluate their biases. We provide a comparative analysis of these models and assess them using a two-fold method: use human judgment to decide whether model predictions are biased and utilize model-level judgment (through further prompts) to understand if a model can self-diagnose the biases of its own prediction.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Understanding and Debugging Failures in N-Gram-Based Generative Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Presents a taxonomy of generative retrieval failures, empirically identifies issues such as ambiguous docids and low diversity in n-gram methods, and introduces a web-based debugging tool.