pith. sign in

arxiv: 2309.13233 · v1 · pith:CNAOYMRKnew · submitted 2023-09-23 · 💻 cs.CL

User Simulation with Large Language Models for Evaluating Task-Oriented Dialogue

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords systemsgoalhumanllmsmodelsprevioussimulatorsystem
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

One of the major impediments to the development of new task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems is the need for human evaluation at multiple stages and iterations of the development process. In an effort to move toward automated evaluation of TOD, we propose a novel user simulator built using recently developed large pretrained language models (LLMs). In order to increase the linguistic diversity of our system relative to the related previous work, we do not fine-tune the LLMs used by our system on existing TOD datasets; rather we use in-context learning to prompt the LLMs to generate robust and linguistically diverse output with the goal of simulating the behavior of human interlocutors. Unlike previous work, which sought to maximize goal success rate (GSR) as the primary metric of simulator performance, our goal is a system which achieves a GSR similar to that observed in human interactions with TOD systems. Using this approach, our current simulator is effectively able to interact with several TOD systems, especially on single-intent conversational goals, while generating lexically and syntactically diverse output relative to previous simulators that rely upon fine-tuned models. Finally, we collect a Human2Bot dataset of humans interacting with the same TOD systems with which we experimented in order to better quantify these achievements.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Science

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SCICONVBENCH is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on multi-turn disambiguation and inconsistency resolution for task formulation in computational science, with frontier models reaching only 52.7% success on fluid mechan...

  2. SalesSim: Benchmarking and Aligning Multimodal Language Models as Retail User Simulators

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SalesSim benchmarks MLLMs as retail user simulators, finds gaps in persona adherence and over-persuasion, and introduces UserGRPO RL to raise decision alignment by 13.8%.

  3. PERCEIVE: A Benchmark for Personalized Emotion and Communication Behavior Understanding on Social Media

    cs.SI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PERCEIVE is the first bilingual benchmark integrating author content, reader emotions from comments, communication behavior, user attributes, and social graphs for personalized social media emotion understanding.

  4. Reinforcing Human Behavior Simulation via Verbal Feedback

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DITTO uses RL with verbal feedback to train LLMs for human behavior simulation, reporting 36% average gains over base models and outperforming GPT-5.4 on 6 of 10 SOUL benchmark tasks.

  5. MUSE: Multi-Domain Chinese User Simulation via Self-Evolving Profiles and Rubric-Guided Alignment

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MUSE generates realistic, persona-consistent Chinese user responses across domains via self-evolving profiles, role-reversal fine-tuning, and rubric-guided multi-turn RL, outperforming baselines in utterance and sessi...

  6. DiPS: Dialogue Policy Selection for High-Stakes Persuasion Agents

    cs.CL 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DiPS uses a trained critic to select persuasion policies via Q-learning in a fire-rescue evacuation task and reports higher success rates than zero-shot LLM or RAG baselines in both simulation and human trials.

  7. Quantifying the Utility of User Simulators for Building Collaborative LLM Assistants

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fine-tuned simulators grounded in real human data produce LLM assistants that win more often against real users than those trained against role-playing simulators.