pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.08666 · v1 · pith:3JZMJ45Gnew · submitted 2023-11-15 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.GT· cs.LG

It Takes Two to Negotiate: Modeling Social Exchange in Online Multiplayer Games

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.GTcs.LG
keywords gamenegotiationonlineoutcomeschatdatasetgamesmessages
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Online games are dynamic environments where players interact with each other, which offers a rich setting for understanding how players negotiate their way through the game to an ultimate victory. This work studies online player interactions during the turn-based strategy game, Diplomacy. We annotated a dataset of over 10,000 chat messages for different negotiation strategies and empirically examined their importance in predicting long- and short-term game outcomes. Although negotiation strategies can be predicted reasonably accurately through the linguistic modeling of the chat messages, more is needed for predicting short-term outcomes such as trustworthiness. On the other hand, they are essential in graph-aware reinforcement learning approaches to predict long-term outcomes, such as a player's success, based on their prior negotiation history. We close with a discussion of the implications and impact of our work. The dataset is available at https://github.com/kj2013/claff-diplomacy.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Automated versus Human Engagement: Mapping Cognitive Bias Triggers in Online Discourse

    cs.SI 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Computational framework detects eight cognitive bias triggers in 3.5M COVID posts, finding bots deploy them more than humans with source-dependent engagement effects and reduced returns from multiple triggers in bot posts.