The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2402.05125 · v3 · pith:LJVRKH3V · submitted 2024-02-05 · cs.CL · cs.AI

Zero-Shot Clinical Trial Patient Matching with LLMs

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:LJVRKH3Vrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords clinicalpatienttrialllmsmatchingpatientssystemtext
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Matching patients to clinical trials is a key unsolved challenge in bringing new drugs to market. Today, identifying patients who meet a trial's eligibility criteria is highly manual, taking up to 1 hour per patient. Automated screening is challenging, however, as it requires understanding unstructured clinical text. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising solution. In this work, we explore their application to trial matching. First, we design an LLM-based system which, given a patient's medical history as unstructured clinical text, evaluates whether that patient meets a set of inclusion criteria (also specified as free text). Our zero-shot system achieves state-of-the-art scores on the n2c2 2018 cohort selection benchmark. Second, we improve the data and cost efficiency of our method by identifying a prompting strategy which matches patients an order of magnitude faster and more cheaply than the status quo, and develop a two-stage retrieval pipeline that reduces the number of tokens processed by up to a third while retaining high performance. Third, we evaluate the interpretability of our system by having clinicians evaluate the natural language justifications generated by the LLM for each eligibility decision, and show that it can output coherent explanations for 97% of its correct decisions and 75% of its incorrect ones. Our results establish the feasibility of using LLMs to accelerate clinical trial operations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Extracting Breast Cancer Phenotypes from Clinical Notes: Comparing LLMs with Classical Ontology Methods

    cs.CL 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLM framework extracts breast cancer phenotypes from clinical notes with accuracy comparable to ontology-based methods and greater adaptability to new diseases.

  2. Enhancing Clinical Trial Patient Matching through Knowledge Augmentation and Reasoning with Multi-Agent

    cs.MA 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    MAKAR multi-agent system improves clinical trial patient matching performance by an average of 7% via knowledge augmentation and reasoning, while supporting privacy-preserving use of smaller models.

  3. Entry-level guide to the use of large language models for medical research

    cs.AI 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A tutorial guide outlining phases for integrating LLMs into medical research, including task formulation, model choice, prompt engineering, fine-tuning, and deployment with ethical considerations.