The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2403.12799 · v1 · pith:GXV5UJ4V · submitted 2024-03-19 · cs.CL · cs.AI

Investigating Text Shortening Strategy in BERT: Truncation vs Summarization

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:GXV5UJ4Vrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords summarizationdocumenttruncationalternativeclassificationinvestigatedperformanceshortening
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The parallelism of Transformer-based models comes at the cost of their input max-length. Some studies proposed methods to overcome this limitation, but none of them reported the effectiveness of summarization as an alternative. In this study, we investigate the performance of document truncation and summarization in text classification tasks. Each of the two was investigated with several variations. This study also investigated how close their performances are to the performance of full-text. We used a dataset of summarization tasks based on Indonesian news articles (IndoSum) to do classification tests. This study shows how the summaries outperform the majority of truncation method variations and lose to only one. The best strategy obtained in this study is taking the head of the document. The second is extractive summarization. This study explains what happened to the result, leading to further research in order to exploit the potential of document summarization as a shortening alternative. The code and data used in this work are publicly available in https://github.com/mirzaalimm/TruncationVsSummarization.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.