REVIEW 2 cited by
Accounting for AI and Users Shaping One Another: The Role of Mathematical Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As AI systems enter into a growing number of societal domains, these systems increasingly shape and are shaped by user preferences, opinions, and behaviors. However, the design of AI systems rarely accounts for how AI and users shape one another. In this position paper, we argue for the development of formal interaction models which mathematically specify how AI and users shape one another. Formal interaction models can be leveraged to (1) specify interactions for implementation, (2) monitor interactions through empirical analysis, (3) anticipate societal impacts via counterfactual analysis, and (4) control societal impacts via interventions. The design space of formal interaction models is vast, and model design requires careful consideration of factors such as style, granularity, mathematical complexity, and measurability. Using content recommender systems as a case study, we critically examine the nascent literature of formal interaction models with respect to these use-cases and design axes. More broadly, we call for the community to leverage formal interaction models when designing, evaluating, or auditing any AI system which interacts with users.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Recommender Systems as Control Systems
Modeling recommender systems as control systems shows that time-optimized fairness interventions can improve overall long-term performance rather than merely trading off against utility.
-
Reactive Users vs. Social Recommender Systems: Managing Opinion Drifts with Adaptive Policies
An adaptive 'pull back after drift' content consumption policy can prevent recommendation-induced opinion drift and, when users value opinion preservation, can yield higher expected utility than a fixed engagement policy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.