The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2405.09444 · v1 · pith:BY7TWCVM · submitted 2024-05-15 · cs.CY · cs.AI

Desk-AId: Humanitarian Aid Desk Assessment with Geospatial AI for Predicting Landmine Areas

Reviewed by Pithpith:BY7TWCVMopen to challenge →

classification cs.CY cs.AI
keywords areasassessmentdesk-aidapproachdatadeskgeospatialhazardous
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The process of clearing areas, namely demining, starts by assessing and prioritizing potential hazardous areas (i.e., desk assessment) to go under thorough investigation of experts, who confirm the risk and proceed with the mines clearance operations. This paper presents Desk-AId that supports the desk assessment phase by estimating landmine risks using geospatial data and socioeconomic information. Desk-AId uses a Geospatial AI approach specialized to landmines. The approach includes mixed data sampling strategies and context-enrichment by historical conflicts and key multi-domain facilities (e.g., buildings, roads, health sites). The proposed system addresses the issue of having only ground-truth for confirmed hazardous areas by implementing a new hard-negative data sampling strategy, where negative points are sampled in the vicinity of hazardous areas. Experiments validate Desk-Aid in two domains for landmine risk assessment: 1) country-wide, and 2) uncharted study areas). The proposed approach increases the estimation accuracies up to 92%, for different classification models such as RandomForest (RF), Feedforward Neural Networks (FNN), and Graph Neural Networks (GNN).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Limits of AI-Driven Allocation: Optimal Screening under Aleatoric Uncertainty

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Optimal allocation screens units at the margin of algorithmic decisions and directly targets highest-risk units, with screening efficiency gains increasing as aleatoric uncertainty rises.