The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2405.10659 · v2 · pith:AJ73LIZX · submitted 2024-05-17 · cs.CL · cs.AI

Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity in Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:AJ73LIZXrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords toxicityllmsmodelsevaluationlanguagelargepromptsthem
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have become integral to our professional workflows and daily lives. Nevertheless, these machine companions of ours have a critical flaw: the huge amount of data which endows them with vast and diverse knowledge, also exposes them to the inevitable toxicity and bias. While most LLMs incorporate defense mechanisms to prevent the generation of harmful content, these safeguards can be easily bypassed with minimal prompt engineering. In this paper, we introduce the new Thoroughly Engineered Toxicity (TET) dataset, comprising manually crafted prompts designed to nullify the protective layers of such models. Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate the pivotal role of TET in providing a rigorous benchmark for evaluation of toxicity awareness in several popular LLMs: it highlights the toxicity in the LLMs that might remain hidden when using normal prompts, thus revealing subtler issues in their behavior.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. KARMA: Karma-Aligned Reward Model Adaptation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    KARMA adapts reward models from Reddit karma data to align LLMs with conversational pragmatics, finding that context-only rewards outperform karma-predictive ones downstream while reducing factuality across conditions.