The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2405.19262 · v3 · pith:PEW4HTIJ · submitted 2024-05-29 · cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

Weak-to-Strong Search: Align Large Language Models via Searching over Small Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:PEW4HTIJrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords largemodelsmodellanguagetextttsearchsmallweak-to-strong
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models are usually fine-tuned to align with human preferences. However, fine-tuning a large language model can be challenging. In this work, we introduce $\textit{weak-to-strong search}$, framing the alignment of a large language model as a test-time greedy search to maximize the log-probability difference between small tuned and untuned models while sampling from the frozen large model. This method serves both as (1) a compute-efficient model up-scaling strategy that avoids directly tuning the large model and as (2) an instance of weak-to-strong generalization that enhances a strong model with weak test-time guidance. Empirically, we demonstrate the flexibility of weak-to-strong search across different tasks. In controlled-sentiment generation and summarization, we use tuned and untuned $\texttt{gpt2}$s to improve the alignment of large models without additional training. Crucially, in a more difficult instruction-following benchmark, AlpacaEval 2.0, we show that reusing off-the-shelf small models (e.g., $\texttt{zephyr-7b-beta}$ and its untuned version) can improve the length-controlled win rates of both white-box and black-box large models against $\texttt{gpt-4-turbo}$ (e.g., $34.4\% \rightarrow 37.9\%$ for $\texttt{Llama-3-70B-Instruct}$ and $16.0\% \rightarrow 20.1\%$ for $\texttt{gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct}$), despite the small models' low win rates $\approx 10.0\%$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Off-the-Shelf LLMs as Process Scorers: Training-Free Alternative to PRMs for Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Chunk-Level Guided Generation uses off-the-shelf large LLMs to score fixed-length chunks from small models via likelihoods, matching trained PRM performance on math benchmarks without reward-model training.

  2. Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    PRIME enables online process reward model updates in LLM RL using implicit rewards from rollouts and outcome labels, yielding 15.1% average gains on reasoning benchmarks and surpassing a stronger instruct model with 1...

  3. Trust Functions: Near-Lossless Weak-to-Strong Generalization by Learning When to Trust the Weak Teacher

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Trust functions filter unreliable weak labels to enable near-lossless weak-to-strong generalization and iterative chaining.