The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2405.19893 · v1 · pith:52UTWEQB · submitted 2024-05-30 · cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CL

Similarity is Not All You Need: Endowing Retrieval Augmented Generation with Multi Layered Thoughts

Reviewed by Pithpith:52UTWEQBopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords augmentedgenerationretrievalsimilaritythoughtsknowledgelayeredmulti
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable achievements in various domains. However, the untimeliness and cost of knowledge updates coupled with hallucination issues of LLMs have curtailed their applications in knowledge intensive tasks, where retrieval augmented generation (RAG) can be of help. Nevertheless, existing retrieval augmented models typically use similarity as a bridge between queries and documents and follow a retrieve then read procedure. In this work, we argue that similarity is not always the panacea and totally relying on similarity would sometimes degrade the performance of retrieval augmented generation. To this end, we propose MetRag, a Multi layEred Thoughts enhanced Retrieval Augmented Generation framework. To begin with, beyond existing similarity oriented thought, we embrace a small scale utility model that draws supervision from an LLM for utility oriented thought and further come up with a smarter model by comprehensively combining the similarity and utility oriented thoughts. Furthermore, given the fact that the retrieved document set tends to be huge and using them in isolation makes it difficult to capture the commonalities and characteristics among them, we propose to make an LLM as a task adaptive summarizer to endow retrieval augmented generation with compactness-oriented thought. Finally, with multi layered thoughts from the precedent stages, an LLM is called for knowledge augmented generation. Extensive experiments on knowledge-intensive tasks have demonstrated the superiority of MetRag.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ElasticMem: Latent Memory as a Learnable Resource for LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ElasticMem enables LLM agents to learn adaptive latent memory retrieval and elastic budget allocation, improving QA accuracy by 24-26% and ALFWorld success by 27-66% over baselines with lower token cost.

  2. GroupRank: A Groupwise Paradigm for Effective and Efficient Passage Reranking with LLMs

    cs.IR 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GroupRank uses groupwise LLM reranking with answer-free data synthesis and a group-ranking reward to reach 65.2 NDCG@10 on BRIGHT while providing 6.4x faster inference than listwise baselines.

  3. The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.

  4. Beyond Relevance: Utility-Centric Retrieval in the LLM Era

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Retrieval systems must prioritize utility for LLM generation quality over traditional relevance metrics, supported by a unified framework distinguishing LLM-agnostic vs specific and context-independent vs dependent utility.