pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.02150 · v3 · submitted 2024-06-04 · 🧮 math.AP · cs.NA· math.NA

Analysis and Simulation of a Fluid-Heat System in a Thin, Rough Layer in Contact With a Solid Bulk Domain

Tom Freudenberg , Michael Eden This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP cs.NAmath.NA
keywords thin rough layerstwo-scale convergenceheat-fluid couplingeffective interface modelsnonlinear viscositygrinding processesnumerical simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

In the limit of vanishing thickness and roughness, a nonlinear fluid-heat system in a thin rough layer reduces to an effective interface model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines heat and fluid interactions in a thin layer with a rough surface and relative motion between surfaces. This setup models cooling in grinding processes. Using two-scale convergence in thin domains, the authors derive an effective interface model for the coupled nonlinear system. They prove existence, uniqueness, and energy estimates, then validate the limit model numerically against the micromodel. Simulations explore the effects of temperature-dependent viscosity and geometry.

Core claim

We derive an effective interface model in 3D (a line in 2D) for the heat and fluid interactions inside the fluid by applying two-scale convergence in thin domains to the nonlinear coupled system.

What carries the argument

Two-scale convergence in thin domains applied to the nonlinear system with temperature-dependent viscosity and convective heat transport.

If this is right

  • The effective model can be used to simulate grinding processes with cooling lubricants more efficiently.
  • Numerical comparisons confirm the limit problem matches the micromodel behavior.
  • Temperature-dependent viscosity influences the fluid flow and heat transport in the interface model.
  • Varying geometrical configurations affect the effective interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar techniques might apply to other thin-layer problems in lubrication or heat transfer with periodic roughness.
  • The model could be extended to include more complex solid-fluid interactions beyond the current setup.

Load-bearing premise

The thin rough layer has both height and roughness periodicity scaled by the same small parameter, allowing two-scale convergence methods to apply to the nonlinear coupled equations.

What would settle it

Direct numerical comparison between solutions of the full micromodel and the effective interface model for successively smaller values of the scaling parameter, checking convergence of fluid velocity and temperature fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2406.02150 by Michael Eden, Tom Freudenberg.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic depiction of the geometric setup. Left: The complete domain with the different subdo￾mains and boundaries. Note that Ω = Ωs ε ∪ Ω f ε ∪ Γε. Right: The reference cell. The rough interface between solid and fluid is given through a Y d−1 -periodic C 1 function γ : Y d−1 → [γ0, 1] for some 0 < γ0 < 1. This lower bound γ0 > 0 ensures that the interface does not touch the bottom boundary; see Remark 2… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of the temperature profiles, at t = 5, for the micro and effective model, with sinusoidal roughness. The effective fluid temperature θ f is only defined on the line (0, 1)×{0} but for visualization purposes the line is being shown with a thickness . (a) ε = 0.1 (b) ε = 0.05 (c) ε = 0.01 (d) Effective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the fluid (top) and pressure (bottom) profiles, at t = 5, for the micro and effective model, with sinusoidal roughness. The line in the effective case is again visualized with a thickness . well with regard to temperature and pressure. This holds true even for uBC, lin, 2, which does not satisfy the assumptions made in Section 2.3. Varying the grain height γ0. We investigate the influence of … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison inside the thin layer of the effective solutions with the averaged micro solutions defined in Eq. (5.1). All solutions are shown at the final time step t = 5 and plotted over Σ. The velocity field for ε = 0.01 is left out for a clearer visualization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Convergence study for the limit ε → 0. Both axes are on a logarithmic scale. Inside the thin layer, meaning for θ f , p, u, we present the error in the L 2 (S × Σ) norm. The error for θ s is computed in L 2 (S × Ωs ε ). To estimate the order of convergence, the black line equals the identity. fluid velocity u. For this, a three-dimensional setup is required. Unfortunately, the ε-problems become compu￾tatio… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the fluid temperature, pressure, and horizontal velocity component for different inflow functions, at t = 5. In black the micro solution, and in orange the effective results. The velocity is visualized along {0.5} × (0, ε). For the other functions, we again compare the average (5.1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the fluid temperature, pressure, and horizontal velocity component for different roughness heights γ0, at t = 5. The solution is visualized as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the fluid temperature, pressure, and horizontal velocity component for different roughness types, at t = 5. The solution is visualized as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Temperature and velocity profile for the three-dimensional setup, at different snapshots in time. At the top, is the resolved micro model, and at the bottom, is the effective model. For the micro model, a cross￾section at x3 = 0.01 is visualized, such that the flow profile is better recognizable. Note, that the mesh for the micro model needs to resolve the roughness structure and therefore the representati… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the effective coupling between heat and fluid dynamics within a thin fluid layer in contact with a solid structure via a rough surface. Moreover, the opposing vertical surfaces of the thin layer are in relative motion. This setup is particularly relevant to grinding processes, where cooling lubricants interact with the rough surface of a rotating grinding wheel. The resulting model is non-linearly coupled through(i) temperature-dependent viscosity and (ii) convective heat transport. The underlying geometry is highly heterogeneous due to the thin, rough surface characterized by a small parameter representing both the height of the layer and the periodicity of the roughness. We analyze this non-linear system for existence, uniqueness, and energy estimates and study the limit behavior within the framework of two-scale convergence in thin domains. In this limit, we derive an effective interface model in 3D (a line in 2D) for the heat and fluid interactions inside the fluid. We implement the system numerically and validate the limit problem through direct comparison with the micromodel. Additionally, we investigate the influence of the temperature-dependent viscosity and various geometrical configurations via simulation experiments. The corresponding numerical code is freely available on GitHub.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes existence, uniqueness, and energy estimates for a nonlinear fluid-heat system (temperature-dependent viscosity, convective transport) in a thin rough layer with relative motion between opposing surfaces. It derives an effective interface model (3D or line in 2D) via two-scale convergence in thin domains as the roughness/height parameter tends to zero, and validates the limit numerically against the micromodel with open-source code.

Significance. If the homogenization limit is rigorously justified, the work supplies a mathematically grounded effective model for heat-fluid coupling in grinding applications, together with reproducible numerics. The combination of analysis for the nonlinear coupled system and direct micromodel validation is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (two-scale convergence analysis)] The central derivation applies two-scale convergence directly to the time-dependent geometry with relative motion of the rough surfaces. Standard results for thin rough domains assume a fixed periodic microstructure; without an explicit change of variables to a fixed reference frame (or equivalent justification), the passage to the limit in the convective term and the nonlinear viscosity term lacks justification. This is load-bearing for the effective interface model.
  2. [§3 (existence, uniqueness, energy estimates)] The energy estimates in the existence/uniqueness section track the dependence on the small parameter and the relative velocity only at a formal level; it is not shown that these estimates remain uniform enough to pass to the limit in the nonlinear terms after the change of variables (if any).
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the relative velocity and the thin-domain scaling should be introduced once and used consistently; the abstract and §2 use slightly different symbols for the same quantities.
  2. [§5] Figure captions for the numerical comparisons should state the precise values of ε used in the micromodel runs and the mesh resolution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our analysis of the nonlinear fluid-heat system in thin rough domains with relative motion. The comments highlight important technical points regarding the justification of the two-scale convergence and the uniformity of estimates. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 (two-scale convergence analysis)] The central derivation applies two-scale convergence directly to the time-dependent geometry with relative motion of the rough surfaces. Standard results for thin rough domains assume a fixed periodic microstructure; without an explicit change of variables to a fixed reference frame (or equivalent justification), the passage to the limit in the convective term and the nonlinear viscosity term lacks justification. This is load-bearing for the effective interface model.

    Authors: We agree that the relative motion introduces a time-dependent geometry, and standard two-scale convergence results for fixed microstructures require adaptation. In the manuscript, the analysis proceeds by first applying a change of variables that maps the moving rough domain to a fixed reference configuration (accounting for the relative velocity between surfaces). This transformation is used to rewrite the convective and nonlinear viscosity terms before passing to the limit. To address the concern, we will add an explicit subsection in §4 detailing the change of variables, verifying that the transformed equations preserve the necessary structure, and confirming that the two-scale convergence applies directly to the fixed-domain formulation. This will include the required a priori bounds to justify the limit passage in the nonlinear terms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3 (existence, uniqueness, energy estimates)] The energy estimates in the existence/uniqueness section track the dependence on the small parameter and the relative velocity only at a formal level; it is not shown that these estimates remain uniform enough to pass to the limit in the nonlinear terms after the change of variables (if any).

    Authors: The energy estimates in §3 are derived via testing the weak formulation with suitable test functions (velocity and temperature), exploiting the monotonicity of the viscosity and the structure of the convective term to obtain bounds that are independent of the small parameter ε and uniform in the relative velocity (within the range considered). These uniform estimates are then used to extract weakly convergent subsequences and pass to the limit. We acknowledge that the uniformity with respect to ε and the subsequent application after the change of variables could be stated more explicitly. We will revise §3 to include a dedicated paragraph highlighting the ε-independent bounds, their dependence on the relative velocity, and how they carry over to the transformed variables to enable the nonlinear limit passage via compactness arguments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is a standard two-scale limit passage with no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper starts from a micromodel PDE system on a heterogeneous thin rough domain (with relative motion of surfaces) and applies two-scale convergence in thin domains to pass to the limit, obtaining an effective interface model. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions; no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems; the ansatz for the limit equations is not smuggled via prior work by the same authors; and the geometry transformation or convergence justification is presented as part of the analysis rather than presupposed. The numerical validation compares the micromodel directly to the derived limit model, which is an independent check rather than a tautology. This is a self-contained homogenization argument whose central claim does not collapse to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; standard PDE theory (existence for variable-viscosity Navier-Stokes and heat equation) is implicitly used but not detailed. No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms visible in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 1191 out tokens · 26499 ms · 2026-05-24T00:20:33.529625+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Acerbi, V

    E. Acerbi, V . Chiad `o Piat, G. Dal Maso, and D. Percivale. An extension theorem from connected sets, and homogenization in general periodic domains. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 18(5):481–496, 1992

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    Ahmed, J

    E. Ahmed, J. Ja ffr´e, and J. E. Roberts. A reduced fracture model for two-phase flow with di fferent rock types. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation , 137:49–70, 2017. MAMERN VI-2015: 6th Inter- national Conference on Approximation Methods and Numerical Modeling in Environment and Natural Resources

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    G. Allaire. Homogenization of the Stokes flow in a connected porous medium. Asymptotic Analysis, 2:203–222, 1989. 3

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    G. Allaire. Homogenization and two scale convergence. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 23(6):1482–1518, 1992

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Almqvist, E

    A. Almqvist, E. Burtseva, K. Rajagopal, and P. Wall. On lower-dimensional models of thin film flow, part c: Derivation of a Reynolds type of equation for fluids with temperature and pressure dependent viscos- ity. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology , 237:135065012211352, 12 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Almqvist, E

    A. Almqvist, E. Essel, L.-E. Persson, and P. Wall. Homogenization of the unstationary incompressible reynolds equation. Tribology International, 40(9):1344–1350, 2007

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    M. S. Alnaes, J. Blechta, J. Hake, A. Johansson, B. Kehlet, A. Logg, C. Richardson, J. Ring, M. E. Rognes, and G. N. Wells. The FEniCS project version 1.5. Arch. Num. Soft., 3, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    F. Alouges. Introduction to periodic homogenization. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 22:147– 186, 12 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    S. Bair, J. Jarzynski, and W. O. Winer. The temperature, pressure and time dependence of lubricant viscosity. Tribology International, 34(7):461–468, 2001

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Basson and D

    A. Basson and D. G ´erard-Varet. Wall laws for fluid flows at a boundary with random roughness.Commu- nications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 61(7):941–987, 2008

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Bayada and M

    G. Bayada and M. Chambat. The transition between the Stokes equations and the Reynolds equation: A mathematical proof. Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 14(1):73–93, Apr 1986

    work page 1986

  12. [12]

    Bayada and M

    G. Bayada and M. Chambat. Homogenization of the Stokes system in a thin film flow with rapidly varying thickness. RAIRO. Mod´ elisation Math´ ematique et Analyse Num´ erique, 23, 01 1989

    work page 1989

  13. [13]

    Benhaboucha, M

    N. Benhaboucha, M. Chambat, and I. Ciuperca. Asymptotic behaviour of pressure and stresses in a thin film flow with a rough boundary. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 63(2):369–400, 2005. 36

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Bhattacharya, M

    A. Bhattacharya, M. Gahn, and M. Neuss-Radu. E ffective transmission conditions for reaction–diffusion processes in domains separated by thin channels. Applicable Analysis, 101(6):1896–1910, 2022

    work page 1910

  15. [15]

    A. N. Brooks and T. J. Hughes. Streamline upwind/petrov-galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 32(1):199–259, 1982

    work page 1982

  16. [16]

    G. A. Chechkin, A. Friedman, and A. L. Piatnitski. The boundary-value problem in domains with very rapidly oscillating boundary. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 231(1):213–234, 1999

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    Chupin and S

    L. Chupin and S. Martin. Rigorous derivation of the thin film approximation with roughness-induced correctors. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 44(4):3041–3070, 2012

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    R. L. de Paiva, R. de Souza Ruzzi, and R. B. da Silva. An approach to reduce thermal damages on grinding of bearing steel by controlling cutting fluid temperature. Metals, 11(10), 2021

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Donato, E

    P. Donato, E. Jose, and D. Onofrei. Asymptotic analysis of a multiscale parabolic problem with a rough fast oscillating interface. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 89:1–29, 03 2019

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Eden and T

    M. Eden and T. Freudenberg. E ffective heat transfer between a porous medium and a fluid layer: Homog- enization and simulation. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 22(2):752–783, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Espenhahn, L

    B. Espenhahn, L. Schumski, D. Meyer, D. St ¨obener, and A. Fischer. Optical measurement approach to analyse the tool-workpiece interacting flow of grinding processes. Flow Measurement and Instrumenta- tion, 93:102407, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Fabricius and M

    J. Fabricius and M. Gahn. Homogenization and dimension reduction of the Stokes problem with Navier- slip condition in thin perforated layers. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 21(4):1502–1533, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Fabricius, A

    J. Fabricius, A. Tsandzana, F. Perez-Rafols, and P. Wall. A Comparison of the Roughness Regimes in Hydrodynamic Lubrication. Journal of Tribology, 139(5):051702, 05 2017

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Analysis and Simulation of a Coupled Fluid-Heat System in a Thin, Rough Layer

    T. Freudenberg. Github repository for “Analysis and Simulation of a Coupled Fluid-Heat System in a Thin, Rough Layer”. https://github.com/TomF98/ Homogenization-thin-layer-with-temperature-dependent-viscosity . July 9, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Freudenberg and M

    T. Freudenberg and M. Eden. Homogenization and simulation of heat transfer through a thin grain layer. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 19(2):569–596, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    M. Gahn, W. J ¨ager, and M. Neuss-Radu. Derivation of stokes-plate-equations modeling fluid flow inter- action with thin porous elastic layers. Applicable Analysis, 101(12):4319–4348, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Gahn and M

    M. Gahn and M. Neuss-Radu. E ffective interface laws for fluid flow and solute transport through thin reactive porous layers, 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    M. Gahn, M. Neuss-Radu, and W. J ¨ager. Two-scale tools for homogenization and dimension reduction of perforated thin layers: Extensions, Korn-inequalities, and two-scale compactness of scale-dependent sets in Sobolev spaces, 2021. Preprint, arxiv.org/abs/2112.00559. 37

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    M. Gahn, M. Neuss-Radu, and P. Knabner. Derivation of e ffective transmission conditions for domains separated by a membrane for different scaling of membrane diffusivity. Discrete and Continuous Dynam- ical Systems - Series S, 10:773–797, 04 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    L. S. Garca-Coln, del Castillo LF, and P. Goldstein. Theoretical basis for the V ogel-Fulcher-Tammann equation. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter, 40(10):7040–7044, Oct. 1989

    work page 1989

  31. [31]

    Geuzaine and J.-F

    C. Geuzaine and J.-F. Remacle. Gmsh: A 3-d finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post- processing facilities. Int. J. Numer. Methods. Eng., 79:1309 – 1331, 09 2009

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    Girault and P.-A

    V . Girault and P.-A. Raviart.Finite element approximation of the Navier-Stokes equations. Springer, 1981

    work page 1981

  33. [33]

    R. Gu, M. Shillor, G. Barber, and T. Jen. Thermal analysis of the grinding process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 39(9):991–1003, 2004

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    Gviniashvili, J

    V . Gviniashvili, J. Webster, and B. Rowe. Fluid flow and pressure in the grinding wheel-workpiece interface. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 127(1):198–205, Feb. 2005

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    Habchi, P

    W. Habchi, P. Vergne, S. Bair, O. Andersson, D. Eyheramendy, and G. Morales-Espejel. Influence of pressure and temperature dependence of thermal properties of a lubricant on the behaviour of circular tehd contacts. Tribology International, 43(10):1842–1850, 2010. 36th Leeds–Lyon Symposium Special Issue: Multi-facets of Tribology

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Heinzel, B

    C. Heinzel, B. Kirsch, D. Meyer, and J. Webster. Interactions of grinding tool and supplied fluid. CIRP Annals, 69(2):624–645, 2020

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    J ¨ager and A

    W. J ¨ager and A. Mikeli´c. On the effective equations of a viscous incompressible fluid flow through a filter of finite thickness. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 51(9-10):1073–1121, 1998

    work page 1998

  38. [38]

    Klocke and A

    F. Klocke and A. Kuchle. Manufacturing Processes 2: Grinding, Honing, Lapping . RWTHedition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Krzaczek and J

    M. Krzaczek and J. Tejchman. Hydraulic fracturing process in rocks – small-scale simulations with a novel fully coupled dem/cfd-based thermo-hydro-mechanical approach. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 289:109424, 2023

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Kumar, F

    K. Kumar, F. List, I. S. Pop, and F. A. Radu. Formal upscaling and numerical validation of unsaturated flow models in fractured porous media. Journal of Computational Physics, 407:109138, 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Lady ˇzenskaja, V

    O. Lady ˇzenskaja, V . Solonniov, and N. Ural’ceva. Linear and quasilinear equations of parabolic type (translated from the russian by S. Smith). American Mathematical Society, 1988

    work page 1988

  42. [42]

    Lukkassen, A

    D. Lukkassen, A. Meidell, and P. Wall. Analysis of the effects of rough surfaces in compressible thin film flow by homogenization. International Journal of Engineering Science, 49(5):369–377, 2011

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Marusic and E

    S. Marusic and E. Marusic-Paloka. Two-scale convergence for thin domains and its applications to some lower-dimensional models in fluid mechanics. Asymptotic Analysis, 23:23–57, 05 2000

    work page 2000

  44. [44]

    Mikeli ´c

    A. Mikeli ´c. Rough boundaries and wall laws.In:Qualitative Properties of Solutions to Partial Differential Equations, Jindich Necas Center for Mathematical Modeling Lecture Notes, 5:103–134, 2009. 38

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Y . Min, M. Kong, C. Li, Y .-Z. Long, Y . B. Zhang, S. Sharma, R. Li, T. Gao, M. Liu, X. Cui, X. Wang, X. Ma, and Y . Yang. Temperature field model in surface grinding: A comparative assessment. Interna- tional Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 5, 09 2023

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Neuss-Radu and W

    M. Neuss-Radu and W. J ¨ager. E ffective transmission conditions for reaction-di ffusion processes in do- mains separated by an interface. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 39(3):687–720, 2007

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    Nevard and J

    J. Nevard and J. B. Keller. Homogenization of rough boundaries and interfaces. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 57(6):1660–1686, 1997

    work page 1997

  48. [48]

    Ortega, H

    N. Ortega, H. Bravo, I. Pombo, J. S ´anchez, and G. Vidal. Thermal analysis of creep feed grinding. Procedia Engineering, 132:1061–1068, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    I. Pop, J. Bogers, and K. Kumar. Analysis and upscaling of a reactive transport model in fractured porous media with nonlinear transmission condition. Vietnam Journal of Mathematics, 45, 04 2016

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    P ´erez, J.-M

    C. P ´erez, J.-M. Thomas, S. Blancher, and R. Cre ff. The steady Navier–Stokes /energy system with temperature-dependent viscosity—part 1: Analysis of the continuous problem. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 56:63 – 89, 01 2008

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Reynolds

    O. Reynolds. On the theory of lubrication and its application to mr. beauchamp tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 177:157–234, 1886

    work page

  52. [52]

    Showalter

    R. Showalter. Montone Operators in Banach Space and Nonlinear Partial Di fferential Equations, vol- ume 49. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 01 1997

    work page 1997

  53. [53]

    Thunich, O

    P. Thunich, O. Sch ¨omig, Y . Tong, R. Arafat, C. Herrmann, and M. M¨uller. On the validity of the reynolds equation for the simulation of wet grinding processes. PAMM, 23(3):e202300109, 2023

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    T ¨onshoff, J

    H. T ¨onshoff, J. Peters, I. Inasaki, and T. Paul. Modelling and simulation of grinding processes. CIRP Annals, 41(2):677–688, 1992

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    Vesali and T

    A. Vesali and T. Tawakoli. Study on hydrodynamic pressure in grinding contact zone considering grinding parameters and grinding wheel specifications. Procedia CIRP, 14:13–18, 2014. 6th CIRP International Conference on High Performance Cutting, HPC2014

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Wiederkehr, A

    P. Wiederkehr, A. Grimmert, I. Heining, T. Siebrecht, and F. W ¨oste. Potentials of grinding process sim- ulations for the analysis of individual grain engagement and complete grinding processes. Frontiers in Manufacturing Technology, 2, 2023

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Wiesener, B

    F. Wiesener, B. Bergmann, M. Wichmann, M. Eden, T. Freudenberg, and A. Schmidt. Modeling of heat transfer in tool grinding for multiscale simulations. Procedia CIRP, 117:269–274, 2023

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Zheng, C

    Y . Zheng, C. Wang, Y . Zhang, and F. Meng. Study on temperature of cylindrical wet grinding considering lubrication effect of grinding fluid. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 121(9):6095–6109, Aug 2022. 39

    work page 2022