Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.02611 v3 pith:YOQUOLN7 submitted 2024-06-03 cs.LG stat.ML

LOLA: LLM-Assisted Online Learning Algorithm for Content Experiments

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords contentlolamethodsalgorithmapproachesexperimentsheadlinepure-llm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern media firms require automated and efficient methods to identify content that is most engaging and appealing to users. Leveraging a large-scale dataset from Upworthy (a news publisher), which includes 17,681 headline A/B tests, we first investigate the ability of three pure-LLM approaches to identify the catchiest headline: prompt-based methods, embedding-based methods, and fine-tuned open-source LLMs. Prompt-based approaches perform poorly, while both OpenAI-embedding-based models and the fine-tuned Llama-3-8B achieve marginally higher accuracy than random predictions. In sum, none of the pure-LLM-based methods can predict the best-performing headline with high accuracy. We then introduce the LLM-Assisted Online Learning Algorithm (LOLA), a novel framework that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with adaptive experimentation to optimize content delivery. LOLA combines the best pure-LLM approach with the Upper Confidence Bound algorithm to allocate traffic and maximize clicks adaptively. Our numerical experiments on Upworthy data show that LOLA outperforms the standard A/B test method (the current status quo at Upworthy), pure bandit algorithms, and pure-LLM approaches, particularly in scenarios with limited experimental traffic. Our approach is scalable and applicable to content experiments across various settings where firms seek to optimize user engagement, including digital advertising and social media recommendations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Calibration-Gated LLM Pseudo-Observations for Online Contextual Bandits

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Calibration-gated LLM pseudo-observations reduce cumulative regret by 19% versus pure LinUCB on a 5-arm news recommendation task when using task-specific prompts, but generic prompts increase regret on both tested env...

  2. Can Explanations Improve Recommendations? Evidence from Prediction-Informed Explanations

    cs.IR 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RecPIE jointly optimizes recommendation predictions and LLM-generated natural-language explanations via alternating training and reinforcement learning, yielding 3-4% accuracy gains and higher human preference on Goog...