pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.21045 · v1 · pith:ZNUKO3IQnew · submitted 2024-07-22 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Unlocking the Potential: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Water Engineering and Research

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords waterengineeringresearchllmstasksmodelstreatmentacross
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked interest in their potential applications across various fields. This paper embarked on a pivotal inquiry: Can existing LLMs effectively serve as "water expert models" for water engineering and research tasks? This study was the first to evaluate LLMs' contributions across various water engineering and research tasks by establishing a domain-specific benchmark suite, namely, WaterER. Herein, we prepared 983 tasks related to water engineering and research, categorized into "wastewater treatment", "environmental restoration", "drinking water treatment and distribution", "sanitation", "anaerobic digestion" and "contaminants assessment". We evaluated the performance of seven LLMs (i.e., GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Gemini, GLM-4, ERNIE, QWEN and Llama3) on these tasks. We highlighted the strengths of GPT-4 in handling diverse and complex tasks of water engineering and water research, the specialized capabilities of Gemini in academic contexts, Llama3's strongest capacity to answer Chinese water engineering questions and the competitive performance of Chinese-oriented models like GLM-4, ERNIE and QWEN in some water engineering tasks. More specifically, current LLMs excelled particularly in generating precise research gaps for papers on "contaminants and related water quality monitoring and assessment". Additionally, they were more adept at creating appropriate titles for research papers on "treatment processes for wastewaters", "environmental restoration", and "drinking water treatment". Overall, this study pioneered evaluating LLMs in water engineering and research by introducing the WaterER benchmark to assess the trustworthiness of their predictions. This standardized evaluation framework would also drive future advancements in LLM technology by using targeting datasets, propelling these models towards becoming true "water expert".

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Earth Science Foundation Models: From Perception to Reasoning and Discovery

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper delivers a unified review and roadmap of Earth science foundation models, structured by capability depth from perception to agentic reasoning and by application breadth across atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithos...

  2. Earth Science Foundation Models: From Perception to Reasoning and Discovery

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review of Earth science foundation models covering capability evolution from perception to discovery, applications across atmosphere/hydrosphere/lithosphere/biosphere/anthroposphere/cryosphere, over 200 datasets, an...