RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation
read the original abstract
Despite Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) showing promising capability in leveraging external knowledge, a comprehensive evaluation of RAG systems is still challenging due to the modular nature of RAG, evaluation of long-form responses and reliability of measurements. In this paper, we propose a fine-grained evaluation framework, RAGChecker, that incorporates a suite of diagnostic metrics for both the retrieval and generation modules. Meta evaluation verifies that RAGChecker has significantly better correlations with human judgments than other evaluation metrics. Using RAGChecker, we evaluate 8 RAG systems and conduct an in-depth analysis of their performance, revealing insightful patterns and trade-offs in the design choices of RAG architectures. The metrics of RAGChecker can guide researchers and practitioners in developing more effective RAG systems. This work has been open sourced at https://github.com/amazon-science/RAGChecker.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
ShadowMerge: A Novel Poisoning Attack on Graph-Based Agent Memory via Relation-Channel Conflicts
ShadowMerge poisons graph-based agent memory via relation-channel conflicts using an AIR pipeline, achieving 93.8% average attack success rate on Mem0 and three real-world datasets while bypassing existing defenses.
-
ShadowMerge: A Novel Poisoning Attack on Graph-Based Agent Memory via Relation-Channel Conflicts
ShadowMerge poisons graph-based agent memory by creating relation-channel conflicts that get extracted and retrieved, achieving 93.8% attack success rate on Mem0 and datasets like PubMedQA while evading prior defenses.
-
ShadowMerge: A Novel Poisoning Attack on Graph-Based Agent Memory via Relation-Channel Conflicts
ShadowMerge exploits relation-channel conflicts to poison graph-based agent memory, achieving 93.8% average attack success rate on Mem0 and real-world datasets while bypassing existing defenses.
-
Grounded Cache Routing for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: When Is It Safe to Reuse an Answer?
GroundedCache reduces unsafe-served rate in RAG answer caching to 0-1.5% (vs 15-51.5% naive) via four validation gates while keeping p50 latency within 1.07x of no-cache baseline.
-
Deepchecks: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
Deepchecks is a new multi-faceted evaluation framework for RAG that incorporates root cause analysis and production monitoring to assess reliability, relevance, and user satisfaction.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.