Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.10136 v3 pith:IELP7E4Y submitted 2024-09-16 cs.AR cs.ET

Count2Multiply: Reliable In-Memory High-Radix Counting

classification cs.AR cs.ET
keywords count2multiplyoperationsotheradditionbulk-bitwisecountingdigitaldram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Computing-in-memory (CIM) has been demonstrated across various memory technologies, ranging from memristive crossbars performing analog dot-product computations to large-scale digital bitwise operations in commodity DRAM and other proposed non-volative memory technologies. However, current CIM solutions face latency and reliability challenges. CIM fidelity lags considerably behind access fidelity. Furthermore, bulk-bitwise CIM, although highly parallelized, requires long latency for operations like multiplication and addition, due to their bit-serial computation. This paper presents Count2Multiply, a technology-agnostic digital CIM approach to perform multiplication, addition and other operations using high-radix, massively parallel counting enabled by CIM bulk-bitwise logic operations. Designed to meet fault tolerance requirements, Count2Multiply integrates traditional row-wise error correction codes, such as Hamming and BCH, to address the high error rates in existing CIM designs. We demonstrate Count2Multiply with a detailed application to CIM in conventional DRAM due to its ubiquity and high endurance. However, we note that the Count2Multiply architecture is compatible with other functionally complete CIM proposals. Compared to the state-of-the-art in-DRAM CIM method, Count2Multiply achieves up to 10x speedup, 8x higher GOPS/Watt, and 9.5x higher GOPS/area, while outperforming GPU for vector-matrix multiplications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.