Generalization vs. Specialization under Concept Shift
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BAAJREMFrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Machine learning models are often brittle under distribution shift, i.e., when data distributions at test time differ from those during training. Understanding this failure mode is central to identifying and mitigating safety risks of mass adoption of machine learning. Here we analyze ridge regression under concept shift -- a form of distribution shift in which the input-label relationship changes at test time. We derive an exact expression for prediction risk in the thermodynamic limit. Our results reveal nontrivial effects of concept shift on generalization performance, including a phase transition between weak and strong concept shift regimes and nonmonotonic data dependence of test performance even when double descent is absent. Our theoretical results are in good agreement with experiments based on transformers pretrained to solve linear regression; under concept shift, too long context length can be detrimental to generalization performance of next token prediction. Finally, our experiments on MNIST and FashionMNIST suggest that this intriguing behavior is present also in classification problems.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Robustifying and Selecting Cohort-Appropriate Prognostic Models under Distributional Shifts
Prognostic models show poorer external calibration with larger distributional shifts between cohorts, but meta-analysis weighting and similarity-based selection improve transportability and clinical utility.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.