The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2410.21662 · v2 · pith:RQ4AQ6KG · submitted 2024-10-29 · cs.CL · cs.LG

f-PO: Generalizing Preference Optimization with f-divergence Minimization

Reviewed by Pithpith:RQ4AQ6KGopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords divergencesoptimizationpreferencelanguagemethodsalgorithmsalignmentdifferent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Preference optimization has made significant progress recently, with numerous methods developed to align language models with human preferences. This paper introduces $f$-divergence Preference Optimization ($f$-PO), a novel framework that generalizes and extends existing approaches. $f$-PO minimizes $f$-divergences between the optimized policy and the optimal policy, encompassing a broad family of alignment methods using various divergences. Our approach unifies previous algorithms like DPO and EXO, while offering new variants through different choices of $f$-divergences. We provide theoretical analysis of $f$-PO's properties and conduct extensive experiments on state-of-the-art language models using benchmark datasets. Results demonstrate $f$-PO's effectiveness across various tasks, achieving superior performance compared to existing methods on popular benchmarks such as AlpacaEval 2, Arena-Hard, MT-Bench, and Open LLM Leaderboard v2. Additionally, we present ablation studies exploring the impact of different $f$-divergences, offering insights into the trade-offs between regularization and performance in offline preference optimization. Our work contributes both practical algorithms and theoretical understanding to the field of language model alignment. Code is available at https://github.com/MinkaiXu/fPO.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $f$-Divergence Regularized RLHF: Two Tales of Sampling and Unified Analyses

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper establishes the first O(log T) regret and O(1/T) sub-optimality bounds for online RLHF under general f-divergence regularization via two sampling algorithms.

  2. The Differences Between Direct Alignment Algorithms are a Blur

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A controlled unification of direct alignment algorithms shows the ranking objective (pairwise vs pointwise) drives alignment quality more than the scalar score optimized.